Really? I think Saddam was a menace and we needed to invade since he was threatening his neighbors (Iran included), but his only association with bin Laden is that both grew up in the area we call the Middle East.
These were two different threats - both needed to be taken care of to bring about peace in the Middle East. But Saddam was, previously, a mainly secular figure. One that bin Laden would have opposed.
Saddam used UBL
UBL used Saddam
...and there is TONS of evidence to that effect. Rather than accept that (which means accepting that the Dems only catalyst for getting voters to polls is incorrect or even a deliberate series of deliberate lies; ie Iraq), politicians have chosen to tell us the sky is blue at night and black in the day. MSM editors and producers have been telling us that the war in Iraq isn't part of the war with AQ, but today alone AQ announced that it had lost 4000 fighters in Iraq (and no one believes that number is exaggerated, but rather grossly understated).