Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse
I say we "eliminate" gun control. And those that advocate it as well if need be.

Second the motion. All in favor?

The drawback is that it isn't just a few shrill jackasses like Schemer, Brady and Swineslime, They're elected because the majority of the voters in their oblasts agree with their viewpoint. For example, most New Yorkers hate guns, hate the freedom implied in gun ownership, and look down their noses at the rest of the country. Not only do they want to be serfs, they want the rest of the country to be subjugated to government also. Likewise in toilets like MA and IL., So you'd have to nuke about 1/4 of the country as a start. Not terribly practical.

23 posted on 09/28/2006 8:24:27 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: from occupied ga
So what? Since when are individual Rights to be held inviolate just because some idiot blue staters got a liberal education?

10% fought the crown. 25% from each side fought the Civil War. 30% of us are gun owners....

I'd say the odds are against "them".

27 posted on 09/28/2006 10:44:57 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Quam terribilis est haec hora)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson