To: BigSkyFreeper
I strongly disagree. Chris Wallace has pointed out that real issues were raised in NONE of the interviews Clinton sat for in the weeks before the Fox one. Clinton expected to go on Fox and be lauded for all his "good works" of late. Wallace is as mild a personality as you'll find in television news and Clinton just made himself look nuts be jabbing at him (literally) and raving on about the "right wing". At the top of his game, Clinton would have unctuously finessed Wallace's question by making himself (Clinton) the victim without reproaching Wallace. Instead, Clinton reacted like a classic narcissist: with pure rage that anyone would have the gall to question him.
24 posted on
09/27/2006 5:05:43 PM PDT by
utahagen
To: utahagen
And, I really don't think this helps Hillary, although they tried their damnedest to spin it. Hillary in the White House means Bill in the White House and when everything becomes about him, people just won't put up with it.
30 posted on
09/27/2006 5:17:42 PM PDT by
Hildy
(Canada is like a loft apartment over a really great party house)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson