Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BigSkyFreeper
I strongly disagree. Chris Wallace has pointed out that real issues were raised in NONE of the interviews Clinton sat for in the weeks before the Fox one. Clinton expected to go on Fox and be lauded for all his "good works" of late. Wallace is as mild a personality as you'll find in television news and Clinton just made himself look nuts be jabbing at him (literally) and raving on about the "right wing". At the top of his game, Clinton would have unctuously finessed Wallace's question by making himself (Clinton) the victim without reproaching Wallace. Instead, Clinton reacted like a classic narcissist: with pure rage that anyone would have the gall to question him.
24 posted on 09/27/2006 5:05:43 PM PDT by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: utahagen

And, I really don't think this helps Hillary, although they tried their damnedest to spin it. Hillary in the White House means Bill in the White House and when everything becomes about him, people just won't put up with it.


30 posted on 09/27/2006 5:17:42 PM PDT by Hildy (Canada is like a loft apartment over a really great party house)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson