Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe; justche
It would be inappropriate to hold back voting for Romney because he is mormon. (Although I would vote against a Muslim....but that is because a good muslim must be a jihadist hoping to subjugate Christians and others.)

I would vote against Romney in the primaries because he is pro-choice as evidenced by this thread. (A womans' right to choose is the same as saying "pro-choice," and "pro-choice" is the same as saying pro-abortion.)

At this point, I'm hard-pressed to vote for McCain no matter if the primary or the general election. Giuliani and Romney I could probably hold my nose and pull the lever.

I'd prefer to be voting for a solid, pro-life, pro-gun, pro-family, pro-growth, pro-ownership, strict-constructionist conservative in the general election. My favorite at this point is Frist of those running. He has the

320 posted on 09/27/2006 8:19:51 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
It would be inappropriate to hold back voting for Romney because he is mormon. (Although I would vote against a Muslim....but that is because a good muslim must be a jihadist hoping to subjugate Christians and others.)

Mormonism is a religious sect. Islam is a political movement that uses religion to further its goals of world domination. So in that sense I would probably not vote for a Muslim anymore than I would vote for a Nazi. Additionally the Koran encourages Muslims to lie to infidels, so I would find it hard to be reassured by a Muslim that he is not an Islamist. Mormonism has no goal of world domination and their holy scriptures do not encourage their members to lie to unbelievers.

Between Guliani and Romney, I suspect that Guliani is a true believer in "Abortion Rights" whereas Romney professes a pro-choice stand for purposes of political expediency (yeah that's probably dishonest). I suspect that if given the opportunity Romney would be more likely to appoint conservative pro-life judges than Guliani. And unfortunately the court is where the future of the pro-life movement lies.

322 posted on 09/27/2006 8:31:53 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (((172 * 3.141592653589793238462) / 180) * 10 = 30.0196631)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
I would vote against Romney in the primaries because he is pro-choice as evidenced by this thread.

He's pro-life.

324 posted on 09/27/2006 8:33:53 PM PDT by JCEccles ("Islam. No religion demands more of others and less of itself.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson