The topic of the thread is the article - some Evo's claim it is full of lies but have failed to produce evidence of one lie. That topic directly relates to the article. My position is the evidence provided by the Evo side of the debate was illogical and invalid. Please explain why you think that has nothing to do with the content of the article (unless this was meant to be another empty accusation)
And you equate my asking for what evidence he has to back up his statements with claiming his statements are a lie?
749 posted on 09/29/2006 10:48:46 AM PDT by tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)