[Last Visible Dog]

You've avoided endorsing or challenging it outright but you have consistently challenged both the questions and arguments I have in opposition to it, and my qualifications and right to do so.

I think it was because some of your statements were factually incorrect.

Here is the topic of this sub-thread (paraphrased):

Evo: This aricle is full of lies

LVD: Please show us these lies

Evo: "Evolution is not anti-religion"

LVD: That is an invalid position based on information in the article.

[tacticalogic]

Apparently I have misunderstood the purpose of the thread. I assumed it was to discuss the content of the article. Apparently it is actually just supposed to be flame bait in yet another battle in the crevo wars.