[tacticalogic]

The truth is Darwinism is not a scientific theory, but a materialistic creation myth masquerading as science. It is first and foremost a weapon against religion – especially traditional Christianity. Evidence is brought in afterwards, as window dressing.

And there you have it. Darwin was not a scientist, but an atheist bent on the destruction of all religion masquerading as a scientist.

[muawiyah]

"Traditional Christianity" is/was the Catholic Church. I thought Protestantism was developed to destroy that particular entity, and long before Darwin's time too!(/sarcasm)

[Dimensio]

Darwin was not a scientist, but an atheist bent on the destruction of all religion masquerading as a scientist.

I believe that you have confused declaration with demonstration. The author assets that "Darwinism" is a "myth" and a "weapon against science", but offers no credible evidence that this is the case. Moreover, your claims about Charles Darwin himself are not only also without evidence, but are also not even a logical conculsion of accepting the claim of the excerpt that you have quoted as factual.

[mugs99]

Darwin was not a scientist, but an atheist bent on the destruction of all religion masquerading as a scientist

Darwin wasn't an Atheist. He was a Unitarian. He believed in Nature's God, not the God of Christian scripture.
"I cannot anyhow be contented to view this wonderful universe, and especially the nature of man, and to conclude that everything is the result of brute force. I am inclined to look at everything as resulting from designed laws, with the details, whether good or bad, left to the working out of what we may call chance."...Charles Darwin
.