[Last Visible Dog]

The only apparent basis the man has for making the assertions and drawing the conclusions in this article is his religion.

Right.

His Ph.D. in cell and molecular biology as well as his a Ph.D. in theology is clearly no basis /sarcasm

Once again you are attacking the man in an attempt to refute his positions - that is fallacious logic.

[tacticalogic]

Once again you are attacking the man in an attempt to refute his positions - that is fallacious logic.

Where have I attacked him personally? I have questioned the basis for his assertions and conclusion, and the logical implicatiions of those assertions and conclusions, period. Please show me where I have attacked this man personally.