[Last Visible Dog]

How should we judge such a transparent attempt to sidestep the question?

What question do you think I sidestepped - I was not responding to a question. Could you please support your accusation.

The only apparent basis the man has for making the assertions and drawing the conclusions in this article is his religion.

So a Ph.D in Molecular and Cell Biology from the University of California at Berkeley is not a basis to comment on evolution. That is a silly statement. Do you have a Ph.D in cell and molecular biology - if not, who are you to question his credentials.

So you plan is to attack the author personally rather than address what the article actually says?

[tacticalogic]

What question do you think I sidestepped - I was not responding to a question. Could you please support your accusation.

Where he got his degree from is irrelevant to the question of what motivated him to pursue it in the first place.

So a Ph.D in Molecular and Cell Biology from the University of California at Berkeley is not a basis to comment on evolution.

Upon what basis in cell and molecular biology does he conclude that TToE is "first and foremost a weapon against religion"?