Replies

Great let me know where the "life was created by nothing" is located because I would like to see that exhibit.

The theory of evolution neither states nor implies that "life was created by nothing", thus your request makes no sense.

Or if that is being cleaned and not available please direct me to the "Evolutionary Intermediary Species Location" because I have yet to find one of those either.

Then you apparently have not sought them out.

Dimensio: The theory of evolution neither states nor implies that "life was created by nothing", thus your request makes no sense.

The Darwinist Theory of Evolution BEGINS AFTER life has been created and AFTER this created life develops the extremely complex ability to pass on traits genetically. Darwinism sets out the first few million or so years.

Like the Church Lady says "How Conveeenient."

When it comes to the origin of life or DNA for that matter - Darwinists can only say "hell if I know"

Yet you will find freeper evo's diving into cosmological debates with their usual arrogance and bullying. It is really strange.

Evo's toggle between using evolution as cosmology and claiming "Homie don't play that" when challenged

This is a quote from the website you linked...

"Species-to-species transitions are even harder to document. To demonstrate anything about how a species arose, whether it arose gradually or suddenly, you need exceptionally complete strata, with many dead animals buried under constant, rapid sedimentation."

There is no case to be made for intraspecies evolution or better yet no facts to prove it - thus a fish does not evolve into an elephant. If there is PROOF of this please provide the evidence. Otherwise evolution is a theory and like any theory is unsubstantiated by evidence.

I will agree that interspecies evolution of traits and genetic characteristics does exist. But there is no mathematical proof that can account for complexity of life based on the pure assumption of genetic chance as a result from environmental adaptation.

"The theory of evolution neither states nor implies that "life was created by nothing", thus your request makes no sense."

I would disagree that progressive secularists would agree with your assertion. Evolution is used as a means to dissuade our population that God had a hand in creating life. This is the argument being played out. Secularists vs. Christian Fundamentalists. Secularists have won because Christians have not been willing to challenge their assertions on Evolution and the Big Bang. Two theories which have no proof or are mathematically impossible.

Cant evolution be used a scientific theory, to describe how a single cell would evolve into a more complex (many cell) organism? If so what is the natural selection process to create the first strand of DNA? These have to be answered before evolution can move from theory to fact. A theory should be open to challenge; if not then it is dead. The more we know the more we understand that life is not a series of random chance events.

Evolutionists have used their theory to "disprove" God - to say otherwise is refuting the current debate being waged in our schools. Evolution is a tool to claim something that is not provable.