Skip to comments.
Why Darwinism Is Doomed
WorldNetDaily ^
| 09/27/2006
| Jonathan Wells
Posted on 09/27/2006 9:56:09 AM PDT by SirLinksalot
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 961-980, 981-1,000, 1,001-1,020 ... 1,181-1,195 next last
To: taxesareforever
She did not outright state that she had converted to Christianity. Moreover, Al Simmons's statement is still not invalidated if he was speaking of events that transpired before 2003, and you have provided no evidence to show that he was speaking of a later time.
981
posted on
09/30/2006 11:34:13 PM PDT
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Al Simmons
It is called narcisism, where a person does not see anyone else as anything but a cardboard cutout.
Other people are not real to them, we are all here for their specific enjoyment, and if we hurt them in any way shape or form, it is not because they might have done something wrong, it is because we are awful people, and just don't understand them.
They are perfect, and no one can tell them otherwise.
I have known a few sick freaks of this persuasion, a number of them have put a gun to their head and pulled the trigger.
No big loss as far as I am concerned.
To: Al Simmons
Come on. Only 18 more to go!
To: Gargantua
The Theory of Evolution is just as much a Faith-based religion as is Christianity, with the exception that there is far more historical proof of Jesus than of Darwins' disproved 'primordial soup'...(snicker!).
When did Darwin make any statements about "primordial soup"? It would appear that you have not actually studied the subject of evolution, which calls into question your qualification on claiming that any part of it is "doomed" -- your credibility rendered even more questionable when you criticize elements of it that it does not actually posess.
984
posted on
09/30/2006 11:36:05 PM PDT
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: js1138
Therefore, he knows that evolution can only be anti-religious in the same sense that all of science is anti-religious. Overstatement placemarker.
To: presently no screen name
Are you talking behind my back? Ugh?
986
posted on
09/30/2006 11:37:33 PM PDT
by
stultorum
(dont hire illegal aliens)
To: presently no screen name
Its getting REAL late because I actually spent 5 minutes trying to figure out what you meant by '18 more to go'!!!
Looks like a fresh crew has arrived, we might even make it by midnight (Pacific time)...
To: Gargantua
Do you believe that "Make that extra crispy, please..." constitutes a valid, logical argument?
988
posted on
09/30/2006 11:41:28 PM PDT
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Jaguarbhzrd
They are perfect, and no one can tell them otherwise.
I think 'they' know otherwise but don't want anyone else to know it.
I feel it is a big loss. It's OK to be wrong, to screw up. I'm sure they wish they could jump out of their skin and feel free.
To: finnman69
Its not opinion. The fact is many reject the overwhelming scientific evidence and study that proves the Universe is approx 13.7 billion years old, And against this, we have the following statements:
"Scientific results are inherently provisional. Scientists can never prove conclusively that they have described some aspect of the natural or physical world with complete accuracy. In that sense all scientific results must be treated as susceptible to error."
--from "http://darwin.nap.edu/books/0309051967/html/15.html" (National Acadmies of Science related webpage)
Try not to overstate your case.
Cheers!
To: stultorum
Fill me in, don't know what are you talking about?
To: presently no screen name
To: Virginia-American
We never see, for example, fossilized pegasi or centaurs. "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence placemarker".
Virginia, that look perilously close to becoming a "Darwin of the Gaps" ;-)
Please don't commit logical errors in your haste.
Cheers!
To: Al Simmons
'18 more to go' - I was wrong anyway - at the time it was only 17.
To: Al Simmons
995
posted on
09/30/2006 11:50:12 PM PDT
by
stultorum
(dont hire illegal aliens)
To: Al Simmons
To: Virginia-American
No, demonstrably bad design shows that the hypothetical designer is not a good engineer. You are jumping to a lot of conclusions!
The details are left as a proof to the interested lurkers on the thread.
Cheers!
To: stultorum
To: grey_whiskers
To: Al Simmons
"Its getting REAL late because I actually spent 5 minutes trying to figure out what you meant by '18 more to go'!!!"
What are you talking about? Eighteen (18) what?
1,000
posted on
09/30/2006 11:51:26 PM PDT
by
stultorum
(dont hire illegal aliens)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 961-980, 981-1,000, 1,001-1,020 ... 1,181-1,195 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson