1 posted on
09/27/2006 5:48:50 AM PDT by
RDTF
To: Cindy; Knitting A Conundrum; Txsleuth
2 posted on
09/27/2006 5:49:30 AM PDT by
RDTF
("We love death. The US loves life. That is the big difference between us two.” Osama Bin laden)
To: RDTF
might make it easier to conduct covert operations...
3 posted on
09/27/2006 5:50:19 AM PDT by
thejokker
To: RDTF
This might be a good thing if Pakistan now no longer claims sovereignity of the new country.
4 posted on
09/27/2006 5:52:28 AM PDT by
Tennessean4Bush
(I would never belong to any club that would have someone like me as a member.)
To: RDTF
So, it seems like Pakistan, like Saudi Arabia before, has made a deal with the devil. We will pay you and concede to you and pay you if you do not attack us. The old feed everyone else to the alligators in hopes that the allegators eat you last. Sad. But at least they are concentrated now for an easy bombing run!
6 posted on
09/27/2006 5:58:52 AM PDT by
Obadiah
To: RDTF
Perfect. Since the Pakis have surrendered that region it opens a new front just in time for the elections. Since it will be the Taliban that we are attacking we get to kill terrorists and pound the Dems at the same time.
12 posted on
09/27/2006 6:21:12 AM PDT by
MattinNJ
(The West has been fighting the war on terror for 1300 years.)
To: RDTF
I don't see it that way. It was a chess move. Now Pakistan has even less of an excuse to keep us out of the Tribal areas. Frankly I think that is where the war on terror should go next. NO EXCUSES, NO APOLOGIES.
14 posted on
09/27/2006 6:23:39 AM PDT by
steel_resolve
(Do you know what a bigot is? Someone winning an argument with a liberal.)
To: RDTF
Waziristan?............Think Spock said that was in what system?.....LOL....Not part of the civilized world lately.
17 posted on
09/27/2006 6:52:58 AM PDT by
litehaus
(A memory tooooo long)
To: RDTF
The US did not loose that battle, Pakistan did. It is a mistake to think that the United States is responsible to win the war with terrorists globaly. Though it is understandable as the United States is about the only country not surrendering in mass. Each country is responsible for its own survival, and Pakistan will pay a very heavy price for its surrender.
Besides, the US is mainly in Pakistan to keep its thumb on the "Islamic Bomb". If Pakistan wants to chop of its arm and hand it to terrorists, that is their problem. As long as the part we control has the bombs, suicide is ok.
19 posted on
09/27/2006 7:22:17 AM PDT by
American in Israel
(A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
To: RDTF
I am really surprised by the lack of postings on this article.
It is scary to think that this is happening and the Maim Stream Press is asleep at the wheel.
I do not trust President Musharraf simply because...well... he is Muslim heading up some of the most radical people on the face of this earth.
I am waiting for some smart individual to tell how I am wrong?
I think before it is all said and done and history is written, that this will be one of President Bush's major failings, trusting Muslims is never a good idea.
I pray for our president but now is not the time to play both sides of the street with the religion of PIECE.
23 posted on
10/02/2006 9:28:29 PM PDT by
OKIEDOC
(Kalifornia now a certified socialist state reporting to Mexico City for further instructions)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson