Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JackDanielsOldNo7
Skilling was aware that Fastow was crossing the line of legality fairly early on.

Lay was not aware - Skilling purposely fudged his presentations to the board to represent matters as being on the up-and-up.

As the house of cards was coming down, Lay was still buying shares and he never sold them.

Lay was derelict in his duties as CEO, but it is hardly clear that he actively particpated in Fastow's schemes. His crime was not asking enough questions.

Lay's situation was not analogous to a bankrobber in league with a safecracker.

8 posted on 09/26/2006 11:20:42 AM PDT by wideawake ("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: wideawake

Where in the world do you get the idea that Lay was "still buying shares and never sold them"?

Between August and October, 2001, as the company stock was plummeting, he sold 918,000 shares worth $70 million!


17 posted on 09/26/2006 9:46:41 PM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson