Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/26/2006 10:52:53 AM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: calcowgirl

I would favor an "Entertainment Tax" with the proceeds going to promoting decent entertainment. Not likely to happen though.


2 posted on 09/26/2006 10:59:27 AM PDT by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: calcowgirl
making it superfluous to spend tax money on it
They have no intention of spending the money as claimed. This is just a scam for California politicians and their cronies to line their pockets.

Hollywood is involved. That speaks volumes. Hollywood spent millions to get the tobacco tax passed. Hollywood collects 20% of that tax and a couple of pennies per dollar go to the stated goal. The other 80% just evaporates into the ether.
.
6 posted on 09/26/2006 12:04:08 PM PDT by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: calcowgirl
"Proposition 87, which would impose an oil extraction tax on companies that drill in California..."

Don't these jerks understand economics. This is a disincentive!

9 posted on 09/26/2006 1:18:31 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson