Harry Smith's pathetic performance is also instructive on the MSN seditious role in proping up Clinton corruption and misfeasence.
In response to three breathtaking factual assertions by his own expert, who is also a known Bush critic, that 1) Clinton, Berger and Clarker are most responsible for Bin Laden because the willingly refused to kill him 2) when they had at least eight chances; and 3) no it is not fair to blame Bush "equally" for 9/11 resulting,
Smith's sputtering response to inappropriately reference the NYT "smear of the day" distorted rumour mongering about and outdated intelligence report possibly critical of Iraq war tactics.
Precisely. I debated whether or not to include it.
Decided not to. Thought the net effect would be to help disseminate that garbage. (More people would read the transcript than any explanation that followed....)