I'm not a huge O'Reilly fan, and I believe Chris Wallace has WAY more credibility as a reporter and interviewer with the general public than BOR, because he was polite and didn't make the interview about himself, the way BOR would have done.
Actually, I thought Wallace handled xxx42 perfectly; he let him rant on, get purple, and yet he remained calm. He asked xxx42 if he wanted to return to Global initiative discussions, but by then, Slick was too deep and too emotional to grab on to the lifeline. I am NOT one who thinks he planned his breakdown on the air: 1) he's not that smart 2) he has a terrible temper. Wallace just sat back and let it play out. He, not Slick, was the cool customer. Any Dems who want to think that Slick did the Dems a favor is engaging in fantasy.
I agree with everything you said.
I agree 100% with your post.
There were those typical lefties wacko's who on digg, youtube etc who were already in full cheerleader mode saying how Clinton "owned" Wallace etc etc.
And then his camp (or should I say Killary's camp) starting spinning immediately that Bill was just trying to "rally the democratic base".
Ok.
|
I agree. But he did plan to spin 9/11 (to us dummies) in response to "the little Pathway to 9/11." (NOTE: The misnomer by clinton was deliberate and meant to convey that he not only didn't watch the ABC movie, he paid it no notice.) What the interview demonstrated: clinton is profoundly dysfunctional; he is a pathological liar, a thug, corrupt, consumed with roiling rage (of the rapist kind), paranoid, self-absorbed, developmentally arrested, inept, delusional, dangerous. (The wife is at least as bad.) BTW, clinton's scapegoating of the 'neocons' is consistent with both clintons' latent antisemitism. |