Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pilsner
Only it was a tax on the honest, because everyone else just lied and said the car was a gift, or that they paid $100 for it.

Some of us do sell cars for $100 because it needs work. Paying taxes on the blue book value would actually winding up costing the seller for selling the vehicle. The State has no right to force us to take a loss.

The State has no authority to 'decide' how much something is worth if the parties to the transaction have agreed on a price. It negates our right to private contract.

I can see requiring a bill of sale with the signature of both parties, but if two parties have affirmed the vehicle is a gift, it's NOT within the rights of the State to say otherwise.

------

If you have a $100 vehicle, park it in front of the Capitol and slap it with a bow. It can be their problem.

Government is killing us because we let it get away with micromanaging our existence and operate outside its legitimate boundaries.

73 posted on 09/26/2006 12:14:21 PM PDT by MamaTexan (I am NOT a 'legal entity'...nor am I a *person* as created by law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: MamaTexan
(If)two parties have affirmed the vehicle is a gift, it's NOT within the rights of the State to say otherwise.

Hey, thanks for straightening me out on that. Next year I'll just tell the IRS that I didn't have any income in 2006, that any money I received was a gift, and that they don't have any right to say otherwise. With any luck I'll not only not have to pay taxes, I'll qualify for welfare! /sarcasm

77 posted on 09/26/2006 12:50:11 PM PDT by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson