Specialized's changed the frame and components of the Rockhopper, maiking the frame lighter, more xc-oriented and downgrading the components.
I don't know what to think of that, I was thinking of getting one to replace my Apex, but now am wondering if I should look more to the Trek 6500.
Ed
Specialized's changed the frame and components of the Rockhopper, maiking the frame lighter, more xc-oriented and downgrading the components.
I don't know what to think of that...IMO it reflects the down side to the popularity of the sport.
The Rockhopper is a
lot cheaper now than when I bought mine. Sounds to me like they're either trying to entice new riders or they're trying to force buyers up to the next level/model to get better quality, for which they'll pay more.
There is a big market out there with lots of competition. Rider preferences makes almost anything I say in the choice moot.
However, the lighter frame is nice, if it's still as strong as before. With a good strong frame that you're comfortable with you can make what you want out of almost any bike. The components have
always been rather low end on that model IMO (thus why
I changed so many of them).
...Trek 6500.Never rode the brand myself. Never was too keen on aluminum frames, though I know the tech has advanced. It's just my preference.
My best choice/recommendation from Specialized, that is if you can afford it, is
the Stumpjumper models, though
the Rockhopper doesn't sound too bad in comparison to the Trek (check out the "tech specs" of each side by side through the links). It's what I'd have bought if the price would've been lower back when I bought.
You can always upgrade individual components, whatever your choice.
Good luck, and ride hard!