1 posted on
09/25/2006 12:30:49 PM PDT by
jveritas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: jveritas
Another great get, Thanks
43 posted on
09/25/2006 2:46:21 PM PDT by
don-o
(Proudly posting without reading the thread since 1998. (stolen from one cool dude))
To: jveritas
45 posted on
09/25/2006 4:04:42 PM PDT by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: jveritas
Brilliant! Will this get out to the public? Or will the Clinton's somehow object to this as well and get it shut down before it sees the light of day? Am I cynical? Yes!
To: jveritas; backhoe; nutmeg; kcvl; Mo1; ASA Vet; BIGLOOK
Bumping fyi and please ping your lists.
The truth re the Clintoons before and after 9/11 is coming out.
49 posted on
09/25/2006 4:42:04 PM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(There's a dwindling market for Marxist Homosexual Lunatic lies/wet dreams posing as news.)
To: jveritas
Outstanding...
52 posted on
09/25/2006 5:39:44 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: jveritas
It doesn't matter what any documents state. The press already knows that there are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and there never were any such weapons. I know because they talking heads tell us this on a daily basis.
53 posted on
09/25/2006 7:00:24 PM PDT by
4yearlurker
(12th district Freeper.)
To: jveritas
64 posted on
09/25/2006 8:44:00 PM PDT by
cookcounty
(Army vet, Army dad)
To: jveritas
Not surprising.Recall that S buried a couple of his jet fighter aircraft-fully intact.With a land area approx equivalent to the size of California,we may never find Saddams WMD's.If we do find WMD's it'll probably be by accident.Example-like the sarin filled artillery shells we found not long ago-that the msm pretty much ignored.
69 posted on
09/26/2006 8:43:37 AM PDT by
Thombo2
To: jveritas
As applied at the beginning of Gulf War I, this will make them hardto- find targets for the enemy’s air force, especially weapons and devices not currently in operation at this time which may be brought into operation in the futureJust my humble opinion, but if the grammar and syntax are correct, this statement could be referring to the bunker-buster bombs we were using.
IOW, the author is telling his men to protect against "penetrators".
70 posted on
09/26/2006 9:11:37 AM PDT by
concretebob
(Those that feed the alligator will be eaten last.)
To: jveritas
79 posted on
09/27/2006 5:29:45 AM PDT by
Velveeta
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson