Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam

Had there been such a lake, with the Dover strait area to its south, then the draining of such a lake southward would have left its northern shores high and dry - there would have to be the second land bridge to the north. Thus IMHO his theory does not hold water.


30 posted on 09/24/2006 7:06:54 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GSlob
I believe that this is covered by the mentioning of sea levels having changed over time. If the over-all sea level was much lower at the time of this occurrence, then the proposed lake would have a northern shore above sea level. But as the general sea level rose, the northern shore was inundated and didn't necessarily have to be eroded down by some cataclysmic event.
37 posted on 09/24/2006 7:35:37 PM PDT by Socratic ( "Better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied" - J.S. Mill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: GSlob
Had there been such a lake, with the Dover strait area to its south, then the draining of such a lake southward would have left its northern shores high and dry - there would have to be the second land bridge to the north. Thus IMHO his theory does not hold water.

I notice there are no maps showing the before and after. I'm having trouble visualizing this.

272 posted on 07/19/2007 1:02:10 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson