To: blam
Had there been such a lake, with the Dover strait area to its south, then the draining of such a lake southward would have left its northern shores high and dry - there would have to be the second land bridge to the north. Thus IMHO his theory does not hold water.
30 posted on
09/24/2006 7:06:54 PM PDT by
GSlob
To: GSlob
I believe that this is covered by the mentioning of sea levels having changed over time. If the over-all sea level was much lower at the time of this occurrence, then the proposed lake would have a northern shore above sea level. But as the general sea level rose, the northern shore was inundated and didn't necessarily have to be eroded down by some cataclysmic event.
37 posted on
09/24/2006 7:35:37 PM PDT by
Socratic
( "Better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied" - J.S. Mill)
To: GSlob
Had there been such a lake, with the Dover strait area to its south, then the draining of such a lake southward would have left its northern shores high and dry - there would have to be the second land bridge to the north. Thus IMHO his theory does not hold water.I notice there are no maps showing the before and after. I'm having trouble visualizing this.
272 posted on
07/19/2007 1:02:10 AM PDT by
js1138
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson