Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Internet and Political Analysis (FreeRepublic mentioned big-time)
The American Thinker ^ | 9/24/2006 | Clarice Feldman

Posted on 09/24/2006 2:53:44 PM PDT by Dark Skies

New communications technologies generally bring with them expectations which are rarely fulfilled.

In about 1948 my dad, always a fan of technology, decided we should have a television set. My mother warned that we kids would stop reading and become lazy idiots if we watched that thing and threatened to leave if he brought one into the house. Naturally, we sided with Dad, and with a 4 to1 vote in his favor, the set was given a prime spot in the living room. And while there were some shows I remember fondly, “I Remember Mama” and “Your Show of Shows”, I don’t remember ever actually learning much from watching it.

Newt Minnow’s judgment that it had quickly become “a vast wasteland” was hard to dispute.

The development of cable channels made television a far better medium to convey a variety of information and entertainment. But it is, after all, a largely passive medium and the viewer can do little but watch and listen. It is not a means by which readers can interact and exchange useful information.

I’m a late comer to the internet. Like television, it too contains a lot of time-wasting diversions. I simply never saw the point of it. But I learned quickly that the net provides a unique and wonderful means of joining people from around the globe with similar interests to work cooperatively to ferret out the truth of things important to them. It seems to be a new technology which really can achieve the goal of providing a quick means of information exchange and intellectual interaction.

Working like a fast global intellectual market, it can join people of diverse backgrounds and viewpoints willing to focus on single issues to discuss, analyze, fact check and inform. Keeping track of major, quickly changing, news stories, is one thing that internet users have excelled at. And there have been different formats to do this – all of which have proven successful.

When Dan Rather ran his story about the President’s service in the Texas National Guard, the first clue that the “evidence” for this was fake appeared on Free Republic, a site where people post excerpts of news reports and commenters respond. One commenter, familiar with the technology, noted that the documents could not have been prepared on typewriters available at the time. The story was quickly picked up by the wonderful Powerline and Little Green Footballs and a “blog swarm” followed.

People with military experience added information. Others researched the stated sources for the story, the history of the principal characters, the credentials of the CBS forensic experts, the ever-changing CBS explanations. In no time the network was hard pressed to answer the serious questions raised about the provenance of the documents and the credibility of the story. The committed followers of the story were able to respond quickly to the rapidly changing story. Other blogs reported what was happening and more people participated in the investigation. CBS was caught out.

Other media scandals followed a similar path. The wonderful British site EUreferendum bore the laboring oar on the fauxtography and staged photos at Qana. Little Green Footballs and others too numerous to recall also gathered valuable information which was quickly exchanged and Reuters and AP were left with few defenders outside of media colleagues similarly compromised by overuse and under-supervision of local stringers and pro-terrorist partisans on their payrolls.

Sweetness & Light and Dan Riehl did great work on exposing the distorted media reports on what happened in Haditha. Unlike the others, the publishers largely did their own work with some, but not much, input from commenters. But their work was so good others could simply rely on what they had done. It only required synthesizing their excellent work into a coherent form so more people could appreciate what they had done.

Similarly, a number of blogs have been working separately on the story about the AP’s Bilal Hussein, preventing the AP from sweeping his obvious links to terrorists under the rug. Michelle Malkin has done a great job in aggregating those links so a reader can link back and forth and piece together the story.

And there are specialty blog sites like Climateaudit which continues to grow as a place where both amateurs and climate scientists debate the state of our knowledge regarding global warming. If the public knew the facts, even those facts tacitly acknowledged by the proponents of global warming, the public would not have such a facile view of this issue. It was this site that blew the whistle on the hockey stick model largely used to argue for global climate warming. As Al Gore takes his “trouble right here in River City” show on the road against a site worth watching.

And I love each and all of these sites. They are an addictive source of information gathering and sharing. But my favorite is Just One Minute, where a dogged band has for years tracked, stored, debated and analyzed every bit of reportage, pleadings, court proceeding transcripts and documentation of the Plame story. Its success is in large part a measure of the bright, witty and civil moderator, Tom Maguire. But it is the truest example of the web providing a means of drawing on that wonderful power of distributed intelligence (Auden’s ironic points of light for the literary minded or Glenn Reynolds’ Army of Davids for the more Biblical minded.)

I owe each and every person who participated in discussions there, even those who violently disagreed with me, more than I can say for being able to track and dissect the Plame case. It quickly had become beyond my capacity alone to fact check the many versions and false reportage that muddied the account. And it proved a unique sounding board for my ideas. Where else could one find so many well-informed and intelligent critics?

Ordinary people with a shared interest in any topic and a civilized place to exchange those views (the ideal political salon) bring more of interest to bear on any given topic than any panel of journalists with fairly identical backgrounds and views. (Come to think of it, it must not have been far different for my male Lithuanian ancestors who I’m told spent all their days sitting around in the local synagogue debating the Talmud and the issues of the day. I just don’t have to be a man or trudge through the snow to get there. Neither do you.)

And if you don’t have enough time to actively participate, you can just stop in and read the fine work they do every day.

Clarice Feldman is an attorney in Washington, DC and a frequent contributor to American Thinker.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blogs; freerepublicrules; internet; mediabias; tvisthefalseprophet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
Go to source for good links!
1 posted on 09/24/2006 2:53:46 PM PDT by Dark Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

Clarice, you are the Bomb.


2 posted on 09/24/2006 2:57:56 PM PDT by Buckhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckhead
I never hear her name that I don't think of Dr. Lector.

And, in other news, continued thx to you, Buckhead, for your stellar detective work!

3 posted on 09/24/2006 3:01:15 PM PDT by Dark Skies (Allah sez "don't look at the man behind the curtain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

BUMP!


4 posted on 09/24/2006 3:03:21 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill

Ping!


5 posted on 09/24/2006 3:03:37 PM PDT by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

Kinda makes you proud, doesn't it? All the time spent on FR is for a GOOD cause, and here's proof it's working.


6 posted on 09/24/2006 3:05:24 PM PDT by kitkat (The first step down to hell is to deny the existence of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

Before the internet little could be done but yell at the TV and fire off a letter to your congress critter, while the wife and kids thought...."whats his problem"?

Now your voice falls on similar minded folks ears instantly.


7 posted on 09/24/2006 3:09:13 PM PDT by mylife (the roar of masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
When Dan Rather ran his story about the President’s service in the Texas National Guard, the first clue that the “evidence” for this was fake appeared on Free Republic, a site where people post excerpts of news reports and commenters respond. One commenter, familiar with the technology, noted that the documents could not have been prepared on typewriters available at the time. The story was quickly picked up by the wonderful Powerline and Little Green Footballs and a “blog swarm” followed.

Powerline and LGF are good, but Free Republic is also "wonderful"!

8 posted on 09/24/2006 3:13:02 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife
Now your voice falls on similar minded folks ears instantly.

I hear ya! LOL!

9 posted on 09/24/2006 3:14:22 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
You noticed, of course, that she lead off her article with mention of FR.

FR is beyond wonderful, it simply "is."

10 posted on 09/24/2006 3:15:13 PM PDT by Dark Skies (Allah sez "don't look at the man behind the curtain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

The collective intelligence and experience of this group is absolutely amazing. No matter what happens, anywhere on earth, involving almost anything on earth, there will suddenly appear several experts to explain and clarify, provide pictures and sources. It is truely the most amazing place.


11 posted on 09/24/2006 3:18:10 PM PDT by McGavin999 (McCain-Warner-Graham-Collins bought and paid for by Al Qaeda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

Ping for the new information age.


12 posted on 09/24/2006 3:20:05 PM PDT by Earthdweller (All reality is based on faith in something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

Cool. Thanks for the post!


13 posted on 09/24/2006 3:20:18 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

Bumpity bump!


14 posted on 09/24/2006 3:27:19 PM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

Excellent post.
Ops4


15 posted on 09/24/2006 3:35:31 PM PDT by OPS4 (Ops4 God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup

Im glad someone does! ;)


16 posted on 09/24/2006 3:39:41 PM PDT by mylife (the roar of masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

Internet/FR bump.


17 posted on 09/24/2006 3:40:33 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OPS4; All
I was reading an article today and at the bottom was a long bio of the writer. The first thought in my mind was, "Who cares...I'll be the judge of the points made in this article. The writer's credentials don't count for anything if the argument made isn't cogent."

It is interesting that the internet has opened up the news to people that don't have journalistic credentials but are experts in the fields under discussion. Gravitas cannot be bought with a bio...it must be evident in each and every article.

18 posted on 09/24/2006 3:46:59 PM PDT by Dark Skies (Allah sez "don't look at the man behind the curtain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

bump


19 posted on 09/24/2006 3:49:19 PM PDT by GOPJ (Muslim outrage would be taken more seriously if Muslims weren't "double standard" hypocrites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

Can you imagine the crap that has been spoon fed to us for hundreds of years? Who knew Wilson was a drooling turnip and his wife was running the government? FDR, weak sickly running the world and so sick a Yalta he couldn't be out of bed for but a few hours? And so on...

What a difference if that information wasn't all in the hands of toe sucking journalist and news barrons. Who knows?


20 posted on 09/24/2006 3:52:49 PM PDT by Leisler (Read the Koran, real Islam is not peaceful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson