Skip to comments.
Pelosi: ‘War in Iraq Is Making it Harder for America to Fight and Win the War on Terror’
House Democratic Leader ^
Posted on 09/24/2006 12:11:13 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 24, 2006
CONTACT: Brendan Daly/Jennifer Crider 202-226-7616 Pelosi: War in Iraq Is Making it Harder for America to Fight and Win the War on Terror
Washington, D.C. House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi released the following statement today on the New York Times report on an April 2006 National Intelligence Estimate which concluded that the war in Iraq was making the war on terror more difficult to fight and win.
The news report on the National Intelligence Estimate is further proof that the war in Iraq is making it harder for America to fight and win the war on terror.
Five years after 9/11 and Osama bin Laden is still free and not a single terrorist who planned 9/11 has been caught and brought to justice. President Bush should read the intelligence carefully before giving another misleading speech about progress in the war on terrorism.
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: pelosi; yap; yapyap; yapyapyapyapyap
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
from Miss America herself.
To: Sub-Driver
2
posted on
09/24/2006 12:14:56 PM PDT
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: Sub-Driver
And this whole time I've been thinking it's all one in the same war. Boy was I wrong...
3
posted on
09/24/2006 12:15:05 PM PDT
by
Right_Handed_Writer
(If you change policy to accommodate ideology, soon all of your policy is ideologically based.)
To: Sub-Driver
This type of clear thinking spells doom for the GOP this November.
To: Sub-Driver
"not a single terrorist who planned 9/11 has been caught and brought to justice."
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed I guess has not be let free by a liberal judge yet. I guess that is what she means by that comment.
To: Sub-Driver
6
posted on
09/24/2006 12:16:11 PM PDT
by
kcvl
To: Right_Handed_Writer
No intelligence..
NO brain..
NO CLUE
God save us from these nitwits.
7
posted on
09/24/2006 12:16:18 PM PDT
by
evad
(sarcasm may be introduced at any moment of any post)
To: Names Ash Housewares
8
posted on
09/24/2006 12:16:47 PM PDT
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: Sub-Driver
Guess we should pull out of Iraq and follow the Democrat plan... which is what?
To: Sub-Driver
You can't really expect a ditzy liberal broad to understand that they are one and the same. The war on terror is being fought against al-Qaeda terrorists. We are fighting al-Qaeda terrorists in Iraq. What are your questions Nancy. Geeesh!
10
posted on
09/24/2006 12:18:50 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(You can't defeat your enemy unless you are willing to get down in the mud with him.)
To: Sub-Driver
How police caught up with the 9/11 mastermind
Jason Burke, Ed Helmore in New York and Rory McCarthy in Lahore
Sunday September 15, 2002
The Observer
snip
Yesterday's confirmation of the arrest of Ramzi bin al-Shibh in Karachi, Pakistan, almost a year to the hour after the attacks on New York and Washington, will provide a massive boost to the American campaign against al-Qaeda and Islamic terrorism.
American authorities have also arrested five men believed to be part of a terrorist cell in a quiet suburb of Buffalo, New York.
http://tinyurl.com/kzph7
11
posted on
09/24/2006 12:19:34 PM PDT
by
kcvl
To: Sub-Driver
Top al Qaeda operative caught in Pakistan
U.S.: Khalid Shaikh Mohammed planned 9/11 attacks
Saturday, March 1, 2003 Posted: 10:52 PM EST (0352 GMT)
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan (CNN) -- The man believed to be the key planner of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 -- and several al Qaeda attacks in the past five years -- was among three terrorism suspects arrested in a CIA-led operation early Saturday in a house outside the Pakistani capital.
The arrest of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed is the single most important in the war on terror since September 11, said a law enforcement official close to the investigation.
He was arrested along with a Pakistani political leader, Ahmed Abdul Qadoos, and a man of Middle Eastern origin, Pakistani government officials said.
http://tinyurl.com/zffmh
12
posted on
09/24/2006 12:21:05 PM PDT
by
kcvl
To: george76
ap
13
posted on
09/24/2006 12:21:36 PM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ......Help the "Pendleton 8' and families -- http://www.freerepublic.com/~normsrevenge/)
To: Sub-Driver
When the liberal from San Francisco is telling us how she would run the war I will be all ears.
Why is she not pressed more by the media about what her plan is? I know the answer but its not a rhetorical question unless the GOP continues to allow the dems to get away with this.
If they can run by simply bashing what is being done without telling us what their plan is we are in trouble. We cannot rely on the media to do this so the GOP needs to start harping on this continually IMO.
14
posted on
09/24/2006 12:24:02 PM PDT
by
volunbeer
(Pelosi)
To: operation clinton cleanup
15
posted on
09/24/2006 12:24:44 PM PDT
by
Sub-Driver
(Proud member of the Republican wing of the Republican Party)
To: Sub-Driver
The democrats have become so predictable that trashing them with scathing comments on FR isn't even fun any more.
16
posted on
09/24/2006 12:25:49 PM PDT
by
Rapscallion
(Peaceful Islam would kill you in a minute for not accepting their god.)
To: Sub-Driver
 |
The only quote I see from the NIE itself is "centrality" of the Iraq war which is something the President has said all along: "Iraq is the central front of the war on terror." The following are the only quotes from intelligence officials: "It's a very candid assessment," one intelligence official said yesterday of the estimate, the first formal examination of global terrorist trends written by the National Intelligence Council since the March 2003 invasion. "It's stating the obvious." Give me a break. "It's a very candid assessment," & "It's stating the obvious" don't appear to me to be meaningful statements of any kind. "But the battlefronts intelligence analysts depict are far more impenetrable and difficult, if not impossible, to combat with the standard tools of warfare." This has nothing to do with Iraq and quite frankly supports what the President has been saying. Here's the next quote from an intel-agent: "What these guys at NIC are supposed to do is to lay it out in very clear, understandable terms," said the intelligence official, who was not authorized to speak on the record. "It's not the role of the NIC to offer recommendations." Rather, it "basically states the conditions" as the intelligence community sees them, he said. What's this really say pro or con? NOTHING.
Sober conclusions The conclusions and tone of the NIE have been reflected in a number of public statements by senior intelligence officials this year. In a February speech at Georgetown University, Negroponte said: "My colleagues and I still view the global jihadist terrorist movement, which emerged from the Afghan-Soviet conflict in the 1980s but is today inspired and led by al Qaeda, as the preeminent threat to our citizens, homeland interests and friends." In a sober and comprehensive address to an armed forces group in Texas in April, Gen. Michael V. Hayden, then-deputy to Negroponte and now CIA director, drew heavily from the NIE judgments. If current trends continued, Hayden said, "threats to the U.S. at home and abroad will become more diverse and that could lead to increasing attacks worldwide." Before delivering the speech, an intelligence official said, Hayden spoke directly to the NIE authors, saying, "I want to make these points" to a public audience. Does this implicate Iraq in any manner? It appears to me that a couple of reporters have the vapors and maybe have this report completely backwards.
|
|
17
posted on
09/24/2006 12:26:42 PM PDT
by
HawaiianGecko
(Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.)
To: NormsRevenge
18
posted on
09/24/2006 12:30:00 PM PDT
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: george76
The Illustrious Eleven
What,
No Kennedys? lol
19
posted on
09/24/2006 12:31:57 PM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ......Help the "Pendleton 8' and families -- http://www.freerepublic.com/~normsrevenge/)
To: Sub-Driver
Step off your soap box missy....your not going to be anything but what you are right now: LOSER!!!
20
posted on
09/24/2006 12:33:12 PM PDT
by
HarleyLady27
(My ? to libs: "Do they ever shut up on your planet?" "Grow your own DOPE: Plant a LIB!")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson