Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: COEXERJ145

I agree about the nukes but there are Russians available to do maintenance - for a price. Thought Hiroshima was bigger but I'll believe 12.5 KT, I would still like about 30 if I was making a point. Especially a ground event.


193 posted on 09/24/2006 5:43:32 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]


To: mad_as_he$$
Hiroshima is debated. Some say 12.5kt while other's day 15kt. Most historians now go with 12.5kt as the more accurate yield. Nagasaki and Trinity were in the 20-22kt range.

30 Kilotons at 500ft to 1500ft would be devastating. Even a ground burst would be very destructive.

That said, I still have serious doubts about these kinds of stories not only because of what I know about nuclear weapons but because the same stories (with minor variations) have appeared every year since Sept. 11th.

194 posted on 09/24/2006 6:01:31 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Free Republic is Currently Suffering a Pandemic of “Bush Derangement Syndrome.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson