Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgan in Denver

So in summing up... Clinton lied as usual in the Wallace interview.


928 posted on 09/24/2006 11:57:10 AM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 922 | View Replies ]


To: johnny7
Clinton either lied over this or it's unknown from all the reporting where the congress would have approved it or been informed. If congress was not informed, he is guilty of breaking the law.

In truth, I don't think Clinton thought of any of that when he made the comments. He lied, which is usual, but he did it to protect himself and give himself cover for his failures with this issue.

I swear, any Freeper could lay out a plausible explanation that Clinton could have used that would have sounded better and made more sense. But, typically for Clinton, he just lied about it and presumed everyone would simply believe him.
934 posted on 09/24/2006 12:06:53 PM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 928 | View Replies ]

To: johnny7
So in summing up... Clinton lied as usual in the Wallace interview.

Brevity, the soul of wit... and in this case accuracy.

Well said, sir.  Well said. 

1,220 posted on 09/24/2006 5:15:26 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 928 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson