Stuffaoctupus is already commenting about it, and the Dem' have jumped all over it.
It seems the NYT's cherry picked what they would report on the document.
No such thing as a coincidence with these people. I will bet my last dollar that it was planned to be timed with the election cycle and clintons appearances today on the talking heads
I said the same thing about the NYT Iraq report leak...
Check it out... the vultures jumped right on it:
http://www.memeorandum.com/
No way i'll fall for it. We know for a fact Saddam was connected to AlQ and no amount of brainwashing from the media can change the facts. Leaks like this (from those who can't say terrorist or write one good piece from Iraq), is a huge part of killing the morale of our military and inside the country; As well as their trumpeting the filibusters and blockages of dems against the Patriot Act, the borders, interrogation and anything else to fight this war.
I can never take the word of the NYT... in fact I think the opposite... they start with bad intentions and haven't learned their lesson yet.
Do these people think that Saddam would not be funding terrorists as in the past? They continue to ignore all the documented evidence (huge piles of it), because the average Joe or Jane is too lazy or doesn't make time to use their brains and check for themselves. The resolutions, plane shots, gassing of Kurds and funding of terror was enough even if we had nothing. Look for the correction in their snips of the report on G23, in a bottom corner of one paragraph, on Thursday.
I guess the party line will go back to 'instead of going to the 'Stan and taking care of that, we have two failed wars'... expect columns from the dems on how they can fight the war better now... Hillary and Kerry first of course.