Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pennsylvania Senate: Santorum Lags by 10 (Casey 49, Santorum 39, Romanelli 5)
Rasmussen Reports ^ | September 22, 2006 | Rasmussen Reports

Posted on 09/23/2006 8:37:46 AM PDT by nj26

In August, the Rasmussen Reports election poll showed Democratic candidate Bob Casey, Jr. leading Republican Senator Rick Santorum by just 48% to 40%. It was the closest the candidates had been all year and many wondered if it marked the beginning of a surge that would enable Santorum to draw even closer.

So far the answer is No. The latest Rasmussen Reports survey shows very similar results; with Casey leading 49% to 39%.

Green Party candidate Carl Romanelli continues to attract 5% support and it's unlikely his slice of the electorate will grow much larger.

The two major-party candidates recently debated for the first time, clashing over the war in Iraq, pay raises for politicians in Pennsylvania and DC, and abortion. Many independent observers say Casey, not exactly renowned as a speaker, surpassed low expectations and was at least on a par with the more fiery incumbent. Some argue that Casey won the debate.

Twenty-seven percent (27%) view Santorum "very favorably," 30% "very unfavorably." For Casey it's 19% very favorable, 18% very unfavorable; only 4% are still "unsure."

Voters here are more likely to trust the GOP on national security, more likely to trust the Democrats on the economy and taxes. On immigration, the split is 37% to 38%, with 25% unsure.

For a plurality of 28%, the top electoral issue is the economy. But national security (21%) and Iraq (18%) aren't far behind, and if they are considered as one issue then they are the top priority for 39%.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: casey; santorum; senate2006
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Hopefully better news will come soon...
1 posted on 09/23/2006 8:37:47 AM PDT by nj26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nj26
Hope Rass gets his butt handed him this election for using the fraudulent "Floating party id" methodology. Calling up 1500 people every 90 days to decide how to weight your polls merely is an indication of if they called more Dems or Republicans. Hey Rass, how about you do your polls 40-40-20 instead of manufacturing excuses to over sample Democrats?
2 posted on 09/23/2006 8:40:33 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Ann Coulter: "I love Freepers!" Told to Freeper eeevil Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nj26
Voters here are more likely to trust the GOP on national security, more likely to trust the Democrats on the economy and taxes. On immigration, the split is 37% to 38%, with 25% unsure.

Nother indication he oversampled Democrats. Trust Democrats on Economy and Taxes?

3 posted on 09/23/2006 8:42:15 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Ann Coulter: "I love Freepers!" Told to Freeper eeevil Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nj26
LOL, voters trust Dems on taxes?

Now that is the only evidence you need on the stupidity of Americans.
4 posted on 09/23/2006 8:42:27 AM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nj26
Ywan it's rasmussen.

Fool me once(i.e the 2000 election)shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.

5 posted on 09/23/2006 8:44:27 AM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nj26

Hopefully, It will be curious if the Party starts to pull money out of this race if he doesnt approve soon. HE ill raise Holy hell if they do but he needs to be showing some improvement soon.


6 posted on 09/23/2006 8:50:29 AM PDT by catholicfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane

I believe he called it perfectly in 2004, including ALL the Congressional elections.


7 posted on 09/23/2006 8:55:01 AM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV

Pollsters have to vary party id somewhat. Otherwise pollsters would have totally missed the 2004 election (when there was a significant increase in GOP identification.)


8 posted on 09/23/2006 9:00:35 AM PDT by nj26 (Border Security=Homeland Security... Put Our Military on the Border! (Proud2BNRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nj26

This race worries me. There were quite a few negative comments about Santorum over the past year here in the Forum. I just hope that conservatives grow up before election day and vote for him.

Sure, he helped Specter get re-elected, but I think that was more the fault of Bush and Rove, who twisted his arm, than Santorum. Other than that one big mistake, and no doubt a few minor ones, he is a great senator.

If Casey once gets into office, he will probably be a Democratic incumbent for the rest of his life. Do we really need that? I hope decent people in Ohio will get out and vote for Santorum.


9 posted on 09/23/2006 9:19:07 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper

Santorum has been abandoned not by the conservative base but by the RINOs who think he is too far to the right for them. I was talking to someone yesterday who is a Republican who told me his friends (also Republicans) will vote for Casey because he is more middle of the road than Santorum. What BS!!!!


10 posted on 09/23/2006 9:35:31 AM PDT by Russ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Russ

Well it is good that the base has come back to him. I know there was silly talk of punishing him. This race is strange because I never see anything about Casey on the National news. IT is almost like he is trying to advoid the cameras and cruise to this election on his daddy's name


11 posted on 09/23/2006 9:38:18 AM PDT by catholicfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I hope decent people in Ohio will get out and vote for Santorum.

Me too, cuz those of us in PA need all the help we can get. And if the folks from Ohio are going to vote for Santorum, throw pne in for Swann.

12 posted on 09/23/2006 9:41:05 AM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Russ

The RNC will pour everything into this race that it has. Santorum will never be abandoned.

Rick has said publicly that he will be behind in every poll up until Election Day.


13 posted on 09/23/2006 9:41:05 AM PDT by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nj26
Rasmussen called here but my husband hung up. If I had answered the phone I would have told them we were going to vote Democrap.

Praying Santorum wins!!! Casey is useless, he is running on his father's name.

14 posted on 09/23/2006 9:43:03 AM PDT by Dustbunny (The BIBLE - Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Trust Democrats on Economy and Taxes?

Duh, of cource! We democtats lrned in publik skool all the things nesessary to suckseed in life - democrats good, republikins bad; Korporations are evil. taxes are good. /s

15 posted on 09/23/2006 9:43:55 AM PDT by FatherofFive (Choose life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dustbunny

"If I had answered the phone I would have told them we were going to vote Democrap."

Just curious.. why?


16 posted on 09/23/2006 10:40:20 AM PDT by nj26 (Border Security=Homeland Security... Put Our Military on the Border! (Proud2BNRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Hey Rass, how about you do your polls 40-40-20 instead of manufacturing excuses to over sample Democrats?

That wouldn't make sense because 40-40-20 doesn't reflect the actual partisan makeup of PA, there actually are more Democrats than Republicans there.

17 posted on 09/23/2006 10:59:25 AM PDT by youthgonewild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska

Oops. Sorry. Only Ohio Democrats vote in Pennsylvania.


18 posted on 09/23/2006 1:08:00 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nj26
Just curious.. why?

Just to throw a monkey wrench into the information super highway. I hate doing polls!!

19 posted on 09/23/2006 3:29:07 PM PDT by Dustbunny (The BIBLE - Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mwl1

To toss out a two-term U.S. Senator with such seniority in the Senate for a feckless, squishy, non-entity candidate is unbelievable. I hope the RNC does everything it can to help Rick.


20 posted on 09/23/2006 6:01:41 PM PDT by Norman Bates (Dan Quayle = Conservative; Rudy Giuliani = Liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson