[RoadTest]

You're reaching too far to make a point. A dog is a dog. A fish isn't a dinosaur.
I'm still in common sense.

[KeepUSfree]

Sorry, your wrong. My wife has a shitzu - and it sure ain't a dog. Not quite sure what species it belongs to. But, I have dogs, and this thing ain't one.

[Dimensio]

You're reaching too far to make a point. A dog is a dog. A fish isn't a dinosaur.

I fail to see how the above relates to the theory of evolution.

[Chuck Dent]

A fish isn't a dinosaur.

Show me the difference(s) between a human embryo & a tadpole. Or, for that matter, the human genome & a fly. The problem with science is the cold reality that one confronts. That's why religious intellectuals, like the current pope, take the smart road by ceding the evolution debate.

Instead, they focus on such inponderables like who/what created energy/matter & the physical properties we see in our current universe? (Are there others in the 'current' plane ie can we only experience a 'slice'? Have there been others before & more to come in infinite time?) As long as science cannot answer those questions, the pope will never get a rebuttal.

[b_sharp]

"You're reaching too far to make a point. A dog is a dog. A fish isn't a dinosaur.

"I'm still in common sense.

I assume you believe 'common sense' is always correct?

Is it common sense to believe that small bits can never accumulate and become large bits?