Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UNGN

Are you just a troll or do you really believe that the DC aircraft were not competitive? Of course Boeing makes a better product but there are still lots of DC jets flying. If it was such a poor aircraft company, then why did Boeing buy them?


19 posted on 09/22/2006 12:53:03 PM PDT by free_at_jsl.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: free_at_jsl.com
Are you just a troll or do you really believe that the DC aircraft were not competitive? Of course Boeing makes a better product but there are still lots of DC jets flying. If it was such a poor aircraft company, then why did Boeing buy them?

As I said earlier, I have been a McDonnell Douglas stockholder since 1974. It was the very first stock I bought because I felt it was a company that could do great things. And they did.

I didn't say they didn't make great airplanes, I said they weren't cost competitive. Nobody bought MD90's or 717's, even though they were much better than the MD80's they sold the hell out of. Maybe because they cost too much?

If not for the Bizarro world of military procurement, Boeing would have sold off the Long Beach plant in 1997 and Moved C-17 production to Dallas or Wichita or 20 other lower cost aviation manufacturing centers of excellence.

As it worked out, they got to charge us taxpayers for the priveledge of building C-17 on the beach, and keep a plant open an extra 15 years that should have been turned into condos.

21 posted on 09/22/2006 2:53:57 PM PDT by UNGN (I've been here since '98 but had nothing to say until now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson