Talk about a white-wash
To: americaprd
What Did They Know,,,When Did They Know It ?
2 posted on
09/21/2006 8:08:54 PM PDT by
1COUNTER-MORTER-68
(THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
To: americaprd
I think this one was predicted with greater accuracy than the current Global Warming estimate, by quite a LONG shot. Of course they had to white wash it, otherwise they might have been CULPABLE.
4 posted on
09/21/2006 8:11:02 PM PDT by
Danae
(Anál nathrach, orth' bháis's bethad, do chél dénmha)
To: americaprd
The Defense Department's inspector general on Thursday dismissed claims That is all you need to read to disregard. Now we see why Arlen Specter stopped his hearings COLD. Because he knew they were about to open a huge can of worms that would shock and outrage Americans. The Status Quo cannot take that chance. Ergo, he passed the ball to the Pentagon, who had denied all claims from the get-go, and--SHOCK!!!--they denied all claims once again in their "official" report. No Congressional investigation. No independent appraisal. They will simply bury the truth.
5 posted on
09/21/2006 8:12:04 PM PDT by
montag813
To: americaprd
Yep. The stench of coverup could choke a skunk.
To: americaprd
7 posted on
09/21/2006 8:16:09 PM PDT by
Prime Choice
(True Conservatives don't vote for Liberals just because they have an 'R' by their name.)
To: americaprd
"we determined that their recollections were not accurate."
And how, exactly, did they do that? Since the IG reviewers weren't there at the time, and haven't seen the Able Danger evidence. But we're supposed to take their word for it.
To: americaprd
It took the AG months to figure out if there was anything to this yet the 9/11 Commission rejected it out of hand. They are still guilty of gross negligence.
9 posted on
09/21/2006 8:26:37 PM PDT by
Dilbert56
To: americaprd
11 posted on
09/21/2006 9:08:48 PM PDT by
PGalt
To: americaprd
And the Dem's talk about conspiracy theories. Well, now we have one. The Dem's are trying to bury the fact that there was information with held from the Bush Administration. Namely Able Danger.
The attacks could have been thwarted had the Liberals allowed the information to surface.
12 posted on
09/21/2006 9:25:51 PM PDT by
Doc91678
(Doc91678)
To: americaprd
And the Dem's talk about conspiracy theories. Well, now we have one. The Dem's are trying to bury the fact that there was information with held from the Bush Administration. Namely Able Danger.
The attacks could have been thwarted had the Liberals allowed the information to surface.
13 posted on
09/21/2006 9:26:05 PM PDT by
Doc91678
(Doc91678)
To: americaprd
Bookmarking for the morning.
14 posted on
09/21/2006 9:27:27 PM PDT by
abner
(Know islam, no peace; No islam, know peace.)
To: americaprd
Is this the end of the road on this?
Just like that?
How could all these poeple that under oath swore of what they saw be blown off so easily?
To: americaprd
18 posted on
09/21/2006 10:50:14 PM PDT by
Dajjal
To: americaprd
And the Clinton juggernaut rolls on and over any and all opposition, crushing it, and would go on to destroy the truth, if it could. It can't.
19 posted on
09/22/2006 5:18:14 AM PDT by
RoadTest
(- as he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit - so it is now.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
