Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Journalistic Falsehoods Set In Motion the Eventual "Loss" of the Vietnam War
The Pasadena Pundit ^ | September 19, 2006 | Wayne Lusvardi

Posted on 09/19/2006 10:04:04 PM PDT by WayneLusvardi

How Journalistic Falsehoods Set In Motion the Eventual "Loss" of the Vietnam War

An excerpt from Triumph Forsaken: The Vietnam War 1954-1965 by Mark Moyar (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006).

"In 1963, the American journalists David Halberstam and Neil Sheehan played pivotal roles in turning influential Americans and South Vietnamese against the Diem regime. Their reporting on military events was inaccurate at times, and it regularly overemphasized the South Vietnamese government's shortcomings. Colonel John Paul Vann, a U.S. Army adviser and the central figure in Sheehan's book A Bright Shining Lie, was more dishonest in dealing with the press than Sheehan ever acknowledged. Vann fed the journalists an extremely misleading version of the Battle of Ap Bac, one that the journalists transformed into the accepted version of the battle. Halberstam and Sheehan presented grossly inaccurate information on the Buddhist protest movement and on South Vietnamese politics, much of which they unwittingly received from secret Communist agents. Ignorant of cultural differences between the United States and Vietnam, they criticized the Diem government for refusing to act like an American government when, in fact, Diem's political methods were far more effective than American methods in treating South Vietnam's problems. South Vietnam's elites, who regularly read Vietnamese translations of American press articles, viewed the New York Times and other U.S. newspapers as mouthpieces of the U.S. administration, with the result that negative articles on the Diem government undermined South Vietnamese confidence in Diem and encouraged rebellion. Although the American journalists hoped that their reporting would bring about the installation of a better South Vietnamese government, it actually caused enormous damage to South Vietnam and to American interests there. Once the coup that they had promoted led to a succession of ineffective governments, exposing them to blame for the crippling of South Vietnam, Halberstam and Sheehan, and fellow journalist Stanley Karnow disparaged Diem with falsehoods so as to claim that South Vietnam was already weak beyond hope before the coup. This turn of events would distort much of the subsequent analysis of the Diem government.....

.....Supporting the coup of November 1963 was by far the worst American mistake of the Vietnam War. Contrary to later assertions by the coup's advocates, the South Vietnamese war effort had not entered into a period of decline during the last months of Diem's rule. Proof that the war was proceeding satisfactorily until the coup comes from North Vietnamese as well as American sources - disproving the thesis that American officials were mindlessly optimistic at the time - and also from the 1963 articles of the journalists who would subsequently propagate the myth of a pre-coup collapse. The deterioration did not begin until the period immediately following Diem's overthrow, when the new leaders failed to lead, feuded with each other, and arrested untold numbers of former Diem supporters. Within a few months of the coup, the pacification effort would collapse in most parts of the countryside, and the regular armed forces would be in the first stages of a lengthy period of decline. These changes would help propel Hanoi toward a strategy of seeking a decisive victory through the destruction of South Vietnam's armed forces, which in turn would eventually force the Americans to decide either to introduce U.S. ground troops or to abandon South Vietnam."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: markmoyar; triumphforsaken; vietnamwar

1 posted on 09/19/2006 10:04:06 PM PDT by WayneLusvardi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WayneLusvardi


Hm....


2 posted on 09/19/2006 11:12:01 PM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce
Its high time the revisionists took on Sheehan and especially Halbertam but I fear Halberstam's reputation has attained iconic status and he is immune to any criticism.


3 posted on 09/19/2006 11:22:04 PM PDT by nathanbedford ("I like to legislate. I feel I've done a lot of good." Sen. Robert Byrd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WayneLusvardi

ping


4 posted on 09/19/2006 11:48:46 PM PDT by SR 50 (Larry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneLusvardi

bump.


5 posted on 09/20/2006 4:33:16 AM PDT by FateAmenableToChange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneLusvardi
South Vietnam's elites, who regularly read Vietnamese translations of American press articles, viewed the New York Times and other U.S. newspapers as mouthpieces of the U.S. administration,... Brought to you from the Walter Cronkite 'School of Yellow Journalism' – these people are still around and still to the left; they hate Bush and they are blame-America-first regardless of how it might harm America and Americans.
6 posted on 09/20/2006 4:45:59 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneLusvardi

The press was particularly greatful to one John F'n (Le Poodle) Kerry for the encouragement and help with their outragious lies and fabrications about the war. And the able assistance he recived from Jane Fonda also helped them lie about the war, destroy the men who went to fight it, and snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

There isn't a place in Hell that is bad enough for the likes of Kerry, Fonda, or their MSM enablers. I'm one of the walking wounded from their lies (please DON'T thank me for my service - I have been too Kerry'ed to care or appreciate it) and that period is one of the darkest of my life, thanks to all of them.


7 posted on 09/20/2006 4:48:57 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneLusvardi
At root the problem is the conceit that journalists are, and of right ought to be, important.

Which we were taught in school, when we should have been learning that

The wisest and most cautious of us all frequently gives credit to stories which he himself is afterwards both ashamed and astonished that he could possibly think of believing . . . It is acquired wisdom and experience only that teach incredulity, and they very seldom teach it enough. - Adam Smith

8 posted on 09/20/2006 4:50:55 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneLusvardi
Hmmmm so maybe 'mom' Sheehan was sought out because of name recognition.
9 posted on 09/20/2006 4:52:00 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
Nobody is immune from criticism, and the present generation has no idea who Halberstam is, and no reason to believe a word he wrote.
10 posted on 09/20/2006 4:56:03 AM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WayneLusvardi
The book looks interesting (Amazon link HERE). I find an eerie parallel to our current situation in Iraq; a hostile media is promoting the myth that we're "losing" the war over there too. Plus ca change...
11 posted on 09/20/2006 5:00:10 AM PDT by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneLusvardi

Why is "lost" in scare quotes? Did we win the war?


12 posted on 09/20/2006 5:17:31 AM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JasonC
Sir, I am the present generation.


13 posted on 09/20/2006 7:19:29 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("I like to legislate. I feel I've done a lot of good." Sen. Robert Byrd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
It is rather bigger than you are, sorry.
14 posted on 09/20/2006 3:38:14 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: WayneLusvardi

Mark for later.


15 posted on 09/20/2006 3:39:23 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson