To: NormsRevenge; Clintonfatigued; AuH2ORepublican; JohnnyZ; Kuksool
He ought to be charged with being a 2nd Degree a$$hole. Why do I say 2nd ? Because the Boulder D.A. ought to be charged with being a 1st Degree a$$hole for buying his bull$hit story and saddling the taxpayers for his extravagant extradition transport from Asia. Anyone with a brain can figure out one or both of the Ramseys were responsible for their daughter's murder. Only the moronic liberal 'Rat D.A.'s there couldn't put 2 and 2 together.
9 posted on
09/19/2006 3:54:10 PM PDT by
fieldmarshaldj
(Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
To: fieldmarshaldj
Anyone with a brain can figure out one or both of the Ramseys were responsible for their daughter's murder. Only the moronic liberal 'Rat D.A.'s there couldn't put 2 and 2 together.
I was wondering about that too, in the beginning. However, didn't the authorities say in recent years that they have DNA evidence from the killer?? In addition, didn't they make all of the Ramseys go through DNA tests to clear them (just like DNA cleared this yahoo of being connected with the crime)?? If one of the Ramsey's killed her, then why doesn't their DNA match that of the killer?? I freely admit that I could be missing something here (we didn't even know until a few years ago that the killer left behind DNA evidence), so if I AM missing something, then let me know!!
This is a very strange case, to say the least.
12 posted on
09/19/2006 4:59:16 PM PDT by
Zetman
(I believe the children are the next generation.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson