Posted on 09/19/2006 8:29:59 AM PDT by MNJohnnie
LOL!!!
Give it up!
even ANN is scared of that man!
;-)
David Frum on Fox: "This speech represents the collapse of Bush's Iran policy."
AND...whose father was brainwashed about Vietnam and a BIG "moderate"...I don't buy Romney at all...
thank you...
check yours....
;-)
Who the hell is he?
Thanks!
GREAT POST!
ROFLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm still hangin' in there with Newt/Rudy '08. ..
What???
AN ASSHOLE?
What did I win?
Idiot caller on line 2....
The exodus has gotten bad enough that it looks as though both states may even lose House seats. Imagine that kind of governance on a national level. It gives me nightmares. There'd be nowhere to move if you wanted/needed to leave.
Like man, y'know, cool dude, Bush lied man, y'know
According to Roll Call (sub. required), 8 Republicans join the trio in opposing the White House: Susan Collins, Olympia Snowe, Richard Lugar, Mike DeWine, Gordon Smith, John Sununu, Lincoln Chafee (natch), and Chuck Hagel.
Makes me all the less bothered DeWine's reelection prospects aren't so hot.
The Roll Call piece also says:
With 11 GOP supporters and the expected backing of a majority of Democrats, the Armed Services proposal, which passed the panel with largely Democratic support last week, could draw as many as 56 votes.
But the senior Senate GOP aide noted that that count would apply only if those Senators actually have an opportunity to vote for the Warner-McCain-Graham alternative to the presidents bill. Frist could decide to use a procedural maneuver, known as filling the amendment tree, to prevent an up-or-down vote on the trios proposal. Still, Frist would need 60 votes to choke off any potential filibuster of the presidents plan a tall order.
While it is always possible that Frist could decide to bring up one or both proposals with no restrictions on amendments, giving opponents an opportunity to present their alternatives, the more likely scenario is one in which Frist tries to restrict the debate in an attempt to minimize the damage that already has been done to a national security message that was supposed to be the Republicans ace in the hole going into the Nov. 7 elections. Additionally, adding structure and limits to the debate could also serve to head-off the potential of Democratic attempts to hijack the proceedings with other issues.
Of course, Frist also could decide to punt the issue into next week or beyond if talks between the warring parties appear to be bearing fruit.
Nice. LOL!
Like Moonbat!
Like Moron!
Big Moonbat caller.
DAGGONE!
You trying to kill us?
AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
MOONBAT!!!!! "Bush wants more war!"
Yea like you know dude
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.