Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Illegal immigrants sue Cafe Express over papers
wfaa ^ | September 18, 2006 | DIANNE SOLÍS and KAREN ROBINSON-JACOBS

Posted on 09/18/2006 8:55:01 PM PDT by stainlessbanner

Cafe Express, a unit of Wendy's International Inc., and a Houston law firm have been sued in Dallas County district court on fraud, unjust enrichment and other allegations on behalf of a group of illegal immigrants.

According to the suit, about 100 employees of Cafe Express were affected when the restaurant chain and its law firm allegedly missed a 2001 deadline to file paperwork that could have allowed the employees to become permanent U.S. residents.

Among them was the lead plaintiff, Jaime Chavez, a 36-year-old Mexican who worked at a Dallas-area Cafe Express.

Cafe Express agreed to help the workers gain permanent legal status, according to court documents. Cafe Express also continued to deduct $25 from the workers' weekly paychecks to cover legal fees from May 2001 through December 2005, even after the key deadline was missed, the suit says.

Bob Bertini a spokesman for Wendy's, said late Monday that he was unable to reach the Cafe Express management team and could not comment on the details of the suit.

One of the lawyers named in the civil suit defended the law firm Boyar & Miller, where she formerly worked.

"I can assure you that Boyar Miller acted appropriately and took all appropriate legal action," said E. Michelle Bohreer, a Houston-based attorney and one of 15 defendants named in the suit. She declined to comment further.

According to court documents, the employees were told of the missed deadline in July when the company sent them letters stating that unless they could prove their applications were filed on time – independent of the law firm – they would be terminated on Sept. 15.

"The thing that really stuck out in our minds is that the very best last chance was missed," said Stan Broome, one of the Dallas lawyers representing the plaintiffs. Mr. Broome is seeking class-action status in the suit.

The restaurant industry is widely acknowledged to be one of the top destinations for immigrant workers without proper documents. And many illegal immigrant workers and employers are increasingly fearful that the federal government will stiffen enforcement of immigration laws.

Lawsuits by illegal immigrants workers are rare. Although some sections of law provide them with protections, a public suit can also expose them to deportation proceedings from the United States.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; bushielovesfoxie; illegal; immigrantlist; immigration; invasion; ourtraitorousleaders; pushtwoforspanish
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

1 posted on 09/18/2006 8:55:02 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

Sorry Jaime, if you don't live here legally, you don't have standing even though you are standing here.

Of course, you can go back to Mehico and sue thru the International Court which will, of course, find in your favor. Thankfully, the US will say - Screw You.


2 posted on 09/18/2006 9:00:08 PM PDT by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
One of the reasons why businesses use illegal immigrants is they know the illegals won't sue.

A great way for us to combat illegal immigrants is to give them more rights to sue employers that break safety or work laws, say triple damages, pay all fees to become legal, pay fees for deportation and in special cases, let juries and judges recommend the illegals for citizenship, hard working, kept their noses clean, etc...
3 posted on 09/18/2006 9:02:44 PM PDT by Hong Kong Expat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

If they arent here legally than they are illegal.
If they are illegal then how can they use the legal system,
maybe we should rename it the nominally legal system.
Or better yet invade Mexico and let Bush and his nation bulding architects build another nominal democracy just
like the one they built in Iraq that doesnt work.


4 posted on 09/18/2006 9:05:34 PM PDT by claptrap (optional tag-line under reconsideration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
I keep saying it, these illegals have more rights in the U.S. than we do! Now they are suing!!

I say "enforce the laws already on the books"!!!!

5 posted on 09/18/2006 9:14:04 PM PDT by blondee123 (Politicians are like diapers, need to be changed often & for the same reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

"Cafe Express agreed to help the workers gain permanent legal status, according to court documents. Cafe Express also continued to deduct $25 from the workers' weekly paychecks to cover legal fees from May 2001 through December 2005, even after the key deadline was missed, the suit says."

I am anti-ILLEGAL immigration. That doesn't mean I countenance -- if the above allegation is true -- exploitation.


6 posted on 09/18/2006 9:16:20 PM PDT by siznartuf (If I Hear "Jobs Americans Won't Do" One More ^%&^%^%# Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: claptrap

Cafe Express should be fined for hiring illegals in the first place.


7 posted on 09/18/2006 9:18:38 PM PDT by nametrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

What excuse does the federal government have now for not sending them home? They can't say they don't know about this group.


8 posted on 09/18/2006 9:22:15 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: siznartuf

According to the article, it was up to the employees, seperately from the attornies, to file certain forms on their own. It appears they did not file the forms. The legal fees were not for filing the forms for them, it was to help them get through the various paperwork. The attornies did their work, the employees failed to follow through on their part. Seems they thought it would be done for them even though they were informed otherwise.


9 posted on 09/18/2006 9:26:59 PM PDT by McGavin999 (McCain-Warner-Graham-Collins bought and paid for by Al Qaeda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

"Seems they thought it would be done for them even though they were informed otherwise."

What you say is certainly plausible.

I would like to know if this was clearly explained to them -- preferably in Spanish (also written documents that the employees would have to sign) -- so that there would be no doubt as to what actions would be required of them. If so, I would think the case would be dismissed as far as this suit goes.


10 posted on 09/18/2006 9:58:41 PM PDT by siznartuf (If I Hear "Jobs Americans Won't Do" One More ^%&^%^%# Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

I wonder if any of them is the Mexican who posted what he describes as "very funny video" of US troops being killed in Iraq.

http://www.cafenetamerica.com


11 posted on 09/18/2006 11:04:13 PM PDT by MaineVoter2002 (http://www.cafenetamerica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt

"Sorry Jaime, if you don't live here legally, you don't have standing even though you are standing here."

A patently absurd statement.


12 posted on 09/19/2006 1:08:57 AM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: claptrap

"If they are illegal then how can they use the legal system..."

Being in the US illegally doesn't estrange one from basic unalienable rights guaranteed by the constitution.


13 posted on 09/19/2006 1:10:57 AM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blondee123

"I keep saying it, these illegals have more rights in the U.S. than we do! Now they are suing!! "

I agree. Some how a couple years ago we all lost the right to sue. Anybody know what's up with that?


14 posted on 09/19/2006 1:12:15 AM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nametrader

And this is proof. Fine them into yesterday for the
money they saved from NOT hiring Red Blooded Americans.

Fate is a tough cookie to swallow.


15 posted on 09/19/2006 1:13:35 AM PDT by MaxMax (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

"And this is proof. Fine them into yesterday for the
money they saved from NOT hiring Red Blooded Americans."

And what savings would that be? I see nothing in the article that indicates the company violated labor law by paying below minimage wages.


16 posted on 09/19/2006 1:16:14 AM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
There is a lot that is gong un-said in this article.

First, I find it hard to believe that Wendy's and a Law Firm would get entangled in scheme to hire and then defraud illegal immigrant workers of $25/week. A more credible scenario is that all these workers, at the time, had green cards giving them a legal temporary worker status.

The company set up a program that would assist them getting permanent legal status to work here (not citizenship). Some filings and deadlines were missed and the workers subsequently have lost their legal temporary status (green card) and are now illegal.
17 posted on 09/19/2006 1:20:49 AM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner; Bob J; Brilliant; bert; Joe 6-pack; bitt; speedy; rightinthemiddle; Peach; onyx

In related news, a MIDDLE finger in Wendy's chili...300 million Americans served.

If legal Americans had been hired in the first place this whole problem would not exist. Exploitation is not an American value. Certainly not one since 1864....

If American CONSUMERS will DELAY GRATIFICATION and not patronize businesses that hire and exploit illegal workers, and pay the slight amount more that businesses need to pay a better wage to legal workers instead of the cost-is-the-only-object attitude, this whole problem would greatly diminish.

But meanwhile, God bless and protect our ICE and Border Patrol!


18 posted on 09/19/2006 1:34:57 AM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

The scenario you describe is highly probable.


19 posted on 09/19/2006 1:36:39 AM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
"And what savings would that be? I see nothing in the article that indicates
the company violated labor law by paying below minimage wages."

Nor did I. Minimage wages don't exist.

Max.
20 posted on 09/19/2006 1:55:40 AM PDT by MaxMax (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson