Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: COEXERJ145

How does that compare to similar vessels and if the costs are significantly higher, why is that?


16 posted on 09/18/2006 8:04:34 PM PDT by Jimnorwellwarren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Jimnorwellwarren
It's a cost vs. versatility issue. The problem is while the Iowas can blast the hell out of anything within range of their guns, they are far more limited than an aircraft carrier. Even if they were put back into service, they could no longer carry TLAM's because all TLAM's now are built for VLS.

Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see the Iowa back in the fleet but is sadly isn't going to happen.

22 posted on 09/18/2006 8:08:08 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Free Republic is Currently Suffering a Pandemic of “Bush Derangement Syndrome.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Jimnorwellwarren

There are no similiar vessels. No other USN ship has any gun larger than 5 inches. the IOWA class has 9 16 inch guns that have a range of 25+ miles.


58 posted on 09/18/2006 9:21:04 PM PDT by quikdrw (Life is tough....it's even tougher if you are stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson