Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: colorado tanker
I love the old Iowa class battleships, but I disagree with this article. If I'm on the ground in a fight, I'd much rather have that money's worth in A-10 support than some more indirect fire capability.

I have nothing against A-10s, but they were designed as an anti-armor weapon. It also assumes available airfieds and air superiority. Nothing is guaranteed. Being within range of artillery support can be priceless.

159 posted on 09/19/2006 11:25:57 AM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: neverdem
I like plenty of artillery too, but an Iowa class battleship is kind of an expensive platform for it. Reagan brought them back to be the capital ships of battle groups with cruise missiles their primary weapon, and we don't need them for that purpose anymore.
177 posted on 09/19/2006 1:44:05 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson