“It is when one is trying to balance the intent of an arguement.”
Then you don’t know how to make logical arguments.
“I just wanted to clarify. So, what is the likelihood? Is it 10 times higher? And how to you quantify those who don’t. Are they still in the 90+% range (that is, those who don’t become traitors)?”
Nobody can quantify human behaviors and preferences such as these. It’s like asking if person A is 64% or only 62% more attractive than person B. Just because we can’t quantify them numerically doesn’t mean everyone is equally attractive.
“You really are ignorant.
“I don’t believe so. “
Well, the ignorant never think they are.
“When you say spies, are you talking of someone who deliberately and maliciously remove documents from their place of work or...”
Yes, that’s what I’m talking about. That’s what the CIA is talking about when they say PRC agents are shockingly effective are turning Chinese American scientists. Stop trying to play these PC word games.
You obvious don’t know anything about this subject, everything you’ve said in this thread is not based on knowledge but on your wishful speculations. Go learn the facts before you waste any more of everyone’s time.
....hmmmm....interestin perspective. So, cannot I not use that same arguement on you :)
Go learn the facts before you waste any more of everyone’s time.
You have the freedom to not reply :)