Because Leiberman's sincere, and Hillary is not on the war?
And no matter what you naively imagine, having one of only TWO national parties taking our national security seriously is dangerous.
This has been explained many times to many different people. It's hard to imagine how you or anyone could at this point be unaware of why we're impassioned in his defense if you've spent anytime at all on this board.
Until I hear otherwise, anyone other than a Republican (even a dish-water Republican) is going to take away our free speech rights, gun ownership rights, voting rights, etc.
Looserman=not a Republican.
Hillary=not a Republican.
So I can't get worked up about either one of them. He's an odd cross for the Republicans to take up. Isn't he running against a Republican out there somewhere? And if not, Looserman is the best choice? Shame on Republicans if they can't back their own candidate with as much moxie as they're backing him.
Sorry.