Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Always Right
So what it seems to be saying is the ADL overstated hours by 500% and then Payne extrapulated those numbers higher to get his. To me if someone thinks your numbers are 5 times too high, they are refuting it. But fairtaxers know different, I guess.
And then he took those hours and multiplied them by the average wage of "IRS employees and that of employees at Arthur Andersen, Inc.," or $28.31. And those are 1985 dollars!!

The ADL study is laughably simplistic and what Payne does with the results is just dumb. Any reasonable person could see this - I guess that's why the FairTaxers don't see it.
80 posted on 09/19/2006 10:00:59 AM PDT by Your Nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: Your Nightmare
Can we assume that you endorse the techniques used by your "respected economist" Mr. Gale in arbitrarily casting out half of Dr. Payne's figures as being a "no-no" as a valid and time-honored economic practice?

Similarly his manipulations in the (non) derivation of the "94% tax" rate???

100 posted on 09/19/2006 1:36:43 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson