Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pigdog

There is now a concerted effort to get me banned. I am in receipt of some private FReepmails showing it.


49 posted on 09/17/2006 12:51:25 PM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Principled
There is now a concerted effort to get me banned. I am in receipt of some private FReepmails showing it.
Ooooo, another conspiracy! Do tell!

You guys are turning into a real tin-foil hat group.
50 posted on 09/17/2006 12:56:36 PM PDT by Your Nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Principled
You are not alone.

Anyone that uses an uncompromising constitutional position in debate will eventually be accused by their opponents of personal attacks.

[It is impossible to refute unconstitutional positions without causing 'offense']

Those who want to argue/debate constitutional issues cannot claim a 'personal attack' just because their opinions on the issue are being refuted. -- The old heat/kitchen/thick skin homily must apply to these types of debates.
54 posted on 09/17/2006 1:14:40 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Principled
Does that surprise you??? That's not an uncommon tactic I can tell you from personal experience.

Apparently it's a "debating tactic" in the view of some.

68 posted on 09/17/2006 3:06:46 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson