Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Principled

Dear Principled,

"Who would eliminate the income tax without a replacement?"

If the NRST legislation were initially passed, it could be passed with the caveat that it would not take effect until the 16th Amendment was repealed. Just change the legislation to state that the NRST will not be put into place, that no national sales tax will be collected, until the 16th Amendment is repealed and the federal government is stripped of any constitutional authority to tax our incomes.

In that case, the income tax would be replaced with the NRST upon the repeal of the 16th Amendment.

If you want to push the repeal first - without first passing a form of the NRST legislation, then the repeal amendment could state that repeal would not be effective until an NRST was put into place.

Actually, I think you'd likely get more support for the NRST AND repeal of the 16th Amendment if it were done this way.


sitetest


298 posted on 09/24/2006 3:10:26 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies ]


To: sitetest

I agree with you on this point.


300 posted on 09/24/2006 3:13:48 PM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson