Those studies have been shown to be misunderstood, misrepresented, and wrong. Since they were paid for by FairTax money, that is to be expected, people typically get what they pay for when studies are done for lobbyists. But when they get to the real world, no one believes them.
You are like the global warming scientists with their studies and lists of aligned scientists.
A mathematician, an accountant, and an economist are applying for the same job.
The interviewer calls in the mathematician and asks "What does two plus two equal?" The mathematician replies "Four". The interviewer asks, "Four, exactly?" The mathematician looks at the interviewer incredulously and says, "Yes, exactly."
The accountant is called in and asked the same question. "What does two plus two equal?" The accountant says "On average, four - give or take 10 per cent, but on average, four."
Finally, the interviewer calls in the economist and poses the same question, "What does two plus two equal?" The economist gets up, locks the door, closes the shades, sits down next to the interviewer and says, "What do you want it to equal?"
"... You are like the global warming scientists ..."
Frankly I don't see what such a gratuitous comment has to do with the FairTax. Perhaps you could explain???
"... misunderstood, misrepresented, and wrong ..."
Please provide the links that demonstrate your claims.
Since you refused to do that on the earlier post, I've not much hope you'll do it now but I'll try.