To: jigsaw
I think if they destroy all their source material, then they should be sued for libel. If they don't have source documents, obviously they made it all up.
10 posted on
09/17/2006 6:57:35 AM PDT by
Shimmer128
( aloha ia, always)
To: Shimmer128
The only difference between an unnamed source and an imaginary friend is the credibility of the journalist. Considering the NYT used to have a guy on the payroll and make things up about actions in another state (Jason Blair?), being on the NYT payroll is not a good place to have any credibility anyway.
14 posted on
09/17/2006 7:01:31 AM PDT by
Bernard
("America is not what's wrong with the world": Donald Rumsfeld)
To: Shimmer128
If they don't have source documents, obviously they made it all up.
To NYT. What proof do you have that you actually talked to an anonymous source at_______?
NYT response: Ummm, well, it depends on the meaning of the word proof. I mean, we printed it so that's proof, isn't it?
19 posted on
09/17/2006 7:26:41 AM PDT by
Zon
(Honesty outlives the lie, spin and deception -- It always has -- It always will.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson