Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rodguy911
I'm always a bit leery about coming down too hard on Powell. My worst nightmare is seeing him become a rat,instead of just acting like one.

Powell is already the rat behind Armitage.

 

« Numbers crunching in Maryland



September 15, 2006

What a load of Armitage!

That's the headline on Victoria Toensing's dynamite column on the Plame case i today's Wall Street Journal. In it she raises several uncomfortable questions about Joseph Wilson, Richard Armitage, and Patrick Fitzgerald.

About Wilson, a serial liar, there is not really much more to say, and Toensin simply notes that Wilson confirmed that his wife, Valerie Plame, returned to th United States from a foreign assignment in 1997-which means that disclosure o her identity in 2003 could not have been a crime under the Intelligence Identitie Protection Act, since that 1982 law covers only disclosures of the names of cover agents stationed abroad within five years of the revelation. Toensing also clears u any ambiguity as to whether Plame could have been a covert agent

As the Senate negotiator for this 1982 act, I know a trip or two by Ms. Plame to a foreign country while assigned to Langley, where she worked in July 2003, is not considered a foreign assignment. I also know covert officers are not assigned to Langley.

As to Armitage, she notes that he has said he did not disclose that he was the source of the disclosure of Plame's name publicly because he was asked not to do so by special prosecutor Fitzgerald. But Armitage learned that he was the source on Oct. 1, 2003, and Fitzgerald was not appointed special prosecutor until Dec. 30, 2003. And "any witness is free to talk about his or her testimony." She puts the responsibility for the controversy squarely on Armitage's silence:

Put aside hundreds of thousands of dollars of taxpayer funds squandered on the investigation, New York Times reporter Judith Miller's 85 days in jail, the angst and legal fees of scores of witnesses, the White House held siege to a criminal investigation while fighting the war on terror, Karl Rove's reputation maligned, and "Scooter" Libby's resignation and indictment. By his silence, Mr. Armitage is responsible for one of the most factually distorted investigations in history.

I think the most troubling questions she raises are about Patrick Fitzgerald, who "knew from the day he took office that the facts did not support a violation of the act." So why did he continue the investigation? I think he has a responsibility to answer that question. And why didn't he find out that Armitage had disclosed Plame's name to Bob Woodward a month before he disclosed it to Robert Novak?

Mr. Armitage, who came forward after Mr. Libby was indicted, was told in February 2006, after two grand jury appearances, he would not be indicted. Mr. Rove, however, after five grand jury appearances, was not informed until July 2006 he would not be charged. Mr. Fitzgerald made the Rove decision appear strained, a close call. Yet of the two men's conduct, Mr. Armitage's deserved more scrutiny. And Mr. Fitzgerald knew it. Each had testified before the grand jury about a conversation with Mr. Novak. Each had forgotten about a conversation with an additional reporter: Mr. Armitage with Mr. Woodward, Mr. Rove with Time's Matt Cooper. However, Mr. Rove came forward pre-indictment, immediately, when reminded of the second conversation. When Mr. Woodward attempted to ask Mr. Armitage about the matter, on two separate occasions pre-indictment, Mr. Armitage refused to discuss it and abruptly cut him off. To be charitable, assume he did not independently recall his conversation with Mr. Woodward. Would not two phone calls requesting to talk about the matter refresh his recollection? Now we also know Messrs. Armitage and Novak have vastly different recollections of their conversation. Isn't that what Mr. Libby was indicted for?

To be charitable: Armitage has an honorable record of public service, and we should not assume he intentionally concealed the Woodward conversation. But, really, how likely is it that he forgot about it for all that time? Novak's most recent column on the subject makes it clear that Armitage was not a regular Novak source, as I had assumed he was; Novak says he never talked to Armitage before Armitage's office summoned him to the interview in which Armitage disclosed Plame's name. But Armitage surely was a regular Woodward source. Any fair reading of Woodward's books on the Bush administration shows that Armitage and the boss to whom he was fiercely loyal, Secretary of State Colin Powell, were Woodward sources. Would you forget that you had been interviewed by Bob Woodward?

I think Victoria Toensing has made a powerful case that Fitzgerald should have ended his investigation before it was begun, that Karl Rove was unjustly brought before a grand jury five times, and that Scooter Libby was unjustly indicted. But, as Glenn Reynolds says, read the whole thing.

Posted at 02:05 PM by Michael Barone

Numbers crunching in Maryland

218 posted on 09/17/2006 7:14:59 AM PDT by antonia (Build the Wall Now! likelytool.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: antonia

Bimp to this.


270 posted on 09/17/2006 7:30:46 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter ( I am sitting under my cone of silence, inside a copper wire cage wearing a tin foil hat...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]

To: antonia

Antonia, Where you ever a NewsMaxer?


279 posted on 09/17/2006 7:33:26 AM PDT by Roccus (Dealing with Democrats IS the War on Terror. [Stolen from FReeper Stallone])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]

To: antonia
I saw that, great catch here. Victoria is a brilliant lady and she put it all together extremely well.

My problem is I am just burnt out on the Novak./plame Wilson/ Scooter/ Rove, blame game! I can't take it anymore!

By now if it's not obvious her husband outed her and she was not a NOC(in a covert job) something is wrong.

324 posted on 09/17/2006 7:53:19 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]

To: antonia

We have has TWO Sundays since that story was made known, about Armitage being the "leaker"...and yet NONE of the Sunday talk shows have even spent a segment to it, as far as I know of.

Doesn't that tell us how much they are disappointed that their help with Plamegate didn't end up ruining Bush's Administration?


370 posted on 09/17/2006 8:07:51 AM PDT by Txsleuth (,((((((((ISRAEL)))))) Pray for the release of the Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]

To: antonia

After reading Victoria Toensing's article, I am wondering if Colin Powell asked Armitage to talk to Novak and supply him with the name of Plame. From the beginning this has sounded like a clandestine attack on the administration from the cabal in the State Department and their cohorts in the CIA. It was a coordinated attack with the MSM and the democrat party in that Chuckie Schumer's letters to the Justice Department and all the speeches on the floor of the Senate and the House kept this lie alive for 3 freaking years! I wish the Justice Department would appoint Victoria and Joe DeGeneva to investigate Fitz and the conspiracy to undermine and possibly bring down a sitting president.


534 posted on 09/17/2006 9:20:48 AM PDT by SwatTeam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson