the nyslimes / GoatHumper lovefest continues...
Posted on 09/16/2006 12:01:58 PM PDT by neverdem
The point the Pope was making in his speech was that violence is no may to spread religion. Islam, in this present day, relies on violence and intimidation to spread its religious beliefs. The Pope was entirely correct. His critics at the Times, as usual, are wrong.
The Times editorial staff, collectively, has the courage of Chicken Little.
(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )
Nightmares in the West and Reality in the East excellent blog by Knitting A Conundrum
In Case Against Politician, a Tale of Friendship, Ambition and Betrayal (William J. Jefferson)
What Would the Democrats Do? (NYT
From time to time, I’ll ping on noteworthy articles about politics, foreign and military affairs. FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.
the nyslimes / GoatHumper lovefest continues...
Thanks for the ping. Great thread. BTTT!
And in response to condemnation of violence done in the name of Religion, Islamic Factists went out and did, and threatended to do, more violence in the name of religion.
And the Appeasement Now Democrats go out and condemn the words instead of the actions!
Thanks for the ping!
A good comparison.
You gave a very nice overview of the mus-lib's manufactured kerfuffle.
The Times is unable to attack the Pope as a theological quack, so they resort to their usual "The facts must be ignored" position.
As someone else pointed out a week or so ago, the title of Hitler's book, "Mein Kampf," can be interpreted as "My Struggle." Mein Jihad.
That was a great article about the NYT's declining circulation. Thanks!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.