They aren't being suppressed, they are being debunked. That is the way of science. New ideas are subjected to tough critical evaluation and those that don't pass have to be rejected or corrected. If your authors can't stand up to what every other published scientist has survived they shouldn't be in the fray.
"Like the democrats, all questions about their religion are immediately attacked often in a personally insulting manner.
Many if not most evolutionary scientists in the Western world are Christian. Do you really think they have the desire to serve two gods? Do you really think the theistic 'evolutionists' would accept the SToE if it attacked their belief system or was without merit? Have you ever asked yourself why the theistic and atheistic scientists agree about the SToE? Perhaps they agree because it has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with the quantity and quality of evidence?
"Darwinism is going down, they just don't know it yet."
That claim has been made for at least 80 years. What makes it more correct now than 80 years ago?