[CBart95]

"openly taking sides in the Cold War' !!!!!

What 's "cold" about the continued deliberate murder of innocent non-combattants?

Let's guess. You think both side have their points of view don't you?

Please don't take it too personally if we wish you a nice life and bye bye. 'Kay?

[Southside_Chicago_Republican]

Did you run out of meds today, pal?

[Lando Lincoln]

Actually, the article mentions that his predecessor, John Paul II, openly took sides in the Cold War. Easy to mis-read the way it is framed.

Lando

[wireman]

Time to up the dosage on the Prozac.

Maybe you should read the whole article too.

[stultorum]

""openly taking sides in the Cold War' !!!!!

"What 's "cold" about the continued deliberate murder of innocent non-combattants?"

======

That was John Paul II taking sides in the Cold War (see below). You must be too young to remember.

"just as his predecessor, John Paul II, reshaped the dimensions of the papacy by openly taking sides in the Cold War."

[bamabound]

"just as his predecessor, John Paul II, reshaped the dimensions of the papacy by openly taking sides in the Cold War. "

I think you miss read this line. He is refereing to John Paul and his taking up the fight for Polish freedom from the commies
"