Well, now you see how it's done.
The "kids" were making a conspiracy movie. If you were writing the script for a conspiracy movie, which one of the following would sound more ominous and conspiratorial to you?
"We asked and asked for photos of actual plane wreckage from the Pentagon...but we asked in vain..."
Or:
"We found dozens, maybe hundreds, of photos of plane wreckage at the Pentagon, some taken even before the roof collapsed on top of everything. Here's a few of the best shots!" :D
Why isn't the video of the jet hitting the Pentagon released?
There was the one video released in 2002 (or 3?) that the conspiracy theorists weren't satisfied with, and then recently one from a Citgo station nearby was released. I *have not seen it* myself yet, but it reportedly does not show a plane moving at 600 mph into the Pentagon any more clearly than the first one did. In other words, those who didn't "see the plane" in the first video probably won't like this one any better. And I do not know if there IS any better footage. We might have already seen the best there is.
The only reason we had a helicopter's eye view of the second plane hitting in New York is because the first plane had already hit. There weren't helicopters in the air and news crews on the ground at the Pentagon until after the damage had been done.
Another point to consider is the nature of surveillance video. It isn't a continuous frame record .. it starts stops start stops . I cannot recall at the moment the frame count but the math says it can miss details of an object moving at 600 mph. All you'll see is a blur .... which I've seen on the latest released video from the parking lot cameras.