I'm hardly a troll...in spite of the fact that my hair has a troll-like quality to it when I wake up first thing in the morning.
I know I should probably drop this and stop feeling so abused ..... but not for a second was I trying to prove any whacko conspiracy concerning 911. If I'm guilty of anything it would be arriving late to the dance.
Ok....so I bought one or two ideas from Loose Change. The fact that we didn't have fighters on the wingtips of the doomed airliners has always had my head itching .... and perhaps the fact that we cannot seem to find an unusually tall raghead carrying around a dialysis machine in the hills of nowheresville.
But I know human nature and I am sure those thoughts have rolled around most of your noggins too ... at some point.
Perhaps the thing I most object to in this thread is being lumped in with the subvertives simply because I had a few questions. Check the history of my posts here. I'm no troll. If anything I figured I'd get zotted over my endless rant against radical islam. To see me get put in the same bag as liberals ... blech ..... I had to take a long, screamingly hot shower after that one.
So ... all this to say ..... wel...I don't know what else to say
I don't think you are, it doesn't hurt to ask questions about major events.
Given that we've only heard audio tape of Osama since the War on Terror began (the videos have been from pre-9/11 or at best, not dateable), I'm not really sure he's still alive. However, assuming he still is, he's alive because we are engaging the War on Terror with one hand behind our back. If we could really enter these lawless areas of Pakistan, we might have already had his head on a spike, but geo-political reality is what it is. And I know people like to look back at WWII as unbridled warfare, but there was political reality there too otherwise Eastern Europe wouldn't have been Communist for 50 years.
I have not been accused of being a troll I'll admit, but I've certainly been thought of as a "shill" for commercial software here. I prefer the moniker "apologist!"
I would also recommend the original site:
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/
The site that Elyse points to is the second version put out by the "truthers"! LOL!
No, not "simply because you had a few questions". It was simply because you were being deliberately coy. Because you never even asked your questions yesterday, even when pressed, and you never answered anyone else's questions of you.
If you decide to act "furtive as a subvertive", don't whine when people suspect you of being one.