Cool videos at the link. The 747LCF is fugly, but functional. Anyone seen any video of the swing tail in action? I have yet to see that.
1 posted on
09/15/2006 8:07:55 AM PDT by
SW6906
To: Paleo Conservative
2 posted on
09/15/2006 8:10:04 AM PDT by
SW6906
(6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
To: SW6906
3 posted on
09/15/2006 8:10:35 AM PDT by
gridlock
(The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
To: SW6906; COEXERJ145; microgood; liberallarry; cmsgop; shaggy eel; RayChuang88; Larry Lucido; ...
If you want on or off my aerospace ping list, please contact me by Freep mail.
To: SW6906
Cool videos at the link. The 747LCF is fugly, but functional. I bet it looks better once it gets a paint job.
To: SW6906
The first thing that came to my mind (for some unknown reason) is that there's no way they ever could have landed that thing at Kai Tak.
(Anyone who ever flew into Kai Tak knows what I mean)
6 posted on
09/15/2006 8:18:10 AM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
("An empty limousine pulled up and Hillary Clinton got out")
To: SW6906
The new 787 has a lot of nice features.
10 posted on
09/15/2006 8:21:31 AM PDT by
Kirkwood
To: SW6906
Sheesh, 5 minutes of beauty shots for 5 seconds of one rotate and one touchdown. Plus, the video was shot in 16x9 widescreen, but encoded into .wma as 4x3 standard format.
Glad Boeing is better at build airplanes than they are at making movies.
19 posted on
09/15/2006 8:35:44 AM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
To: SW6906
Perhaps a mascot is needed for this plane?
21 posted on
09/15/2006 8:40:40 AM PDT by
Fudd
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson