Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: quantim

"...small business owners who often work doggedly for a lot less. And oh, they create jobs rather than cost them."

It was an observation, not an endorsement of unions. Everyone knows that management/employee relations is cyclic, and that when the cycle favors unions, business and often the economy suffers. The cycle now favors management.
Think of the cycle as releasing energy. If the cycle is stopped in favor of one group for a long period of time, bad things can happen. If it favors unions for too long, as it did in the 70s and 80s, businesses and the economy are significantly damaged. If it favors management too long, you have worker unrest and political upheaval.


43 posted on 09/15/2006 6:50:28 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: brownsfan

It also should be noted the difference between those unions which can /will be excised because of a free market such as the UAW, Teamsters and the like, as opposed to the 'super protected, unions like the federally protected railroad workers that are tax-subsidized.

My next door neighbor is one such person - lives like a king, never gets dirty, and protected from cradle to grave.


51 posted on 09/15/2006 7:12:41 AM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson